Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Man of Science condemned for failing to drink the kool aid
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mkatzwork" data-source="post: 60541976" data-attributes="member: 307327"><p>To be fair to Jazer, yes, you can, all though it's almost always lumped together with microbiology.</p><p></p><p>There are a few other microbiologists, for example Georgia Purdom, who believe in creationism - we're talking the sort of number you can count with your fingers and not much higher, since the very most who believe in it amongst the entire scientific community even she admitted was at most "several thousand" - seems impressive until you realize there are approximately 6 million scientific researchers active as of 2006). </p><p></p><p>She published in mainstream papers for a while, but now peer reviews two that were set up precisely because creation 'scientists' couldn't get flawed work past the peer review process, so they made up their own with rather less stringent standards. </p><p></p><p>Believe me - if anybody came up with a paper that was scientifically sound (quoting biblical text is not allowed as is quoting harry potter or anything other than prior scientific work); and showed something that was somehow impossible in evolutionary theory, they'd be a) rich b) famous c) a rock star in the scientific community. 150 years and <u>nobody</u> has managed it. Editors would kill to publish it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mkatzwork, post: 60541976, member: 307327"] To be fair to Jazer, yes, you can, all though it's almost always lumped together with microbiology. There are a few other microbiologists, for example Georgia Purdom, who believe in creationism - we're talking the sort of number you can count with your fingers and not much higher, since the very most who believe in it amongst the entire scientific community even she admitted was at most "several thousand" - seems impressive until you realize there are approximately 6 million scientific researchers active as of 2006). She published in mainstream papers for a while, but now peer reviews two that were set up precisely because creation 'scientists' couldn't get flawed work past the peer review process, so they made up their own with rather less stringent standards. Believe me - if anybody came up with a paper that was scientifically sound (quoting biblical text is not allowed as is quoting harry potter or anything other than prior scientific work); and showed something that was somehow impossible in evolutionary theory, they'd be a) rich b) famous c) a rock star in the scientific community. 150 years and [U]nobody[/U] has managed it. Editors would kill to publish it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Man of Science condemned for failing to drink the kool aid
Top
Bottom