They have a mixture of features from earlier and later species. They are transitional by definition.
And yet you can't supply that theory with supporting evidence.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No more then you can provide evidence that they are transitional.
There is more then one pea in a pod and there are more theories to explain what we find in the natural evidence other then just Darwin's theory.
Yet the Bible has remained unchanged for over 3500 years. Maybe more people understand more then what it use to be.
For Creationist the extinction of Coelophysis was very important. Not so important for the Evolutionist who does not see any new beginning with the Coelophysis.
I thought we already did this. I was talking about Edwin H Colbert, according to Wiki: "His fieldwork in Antarctica in 1969 helped solidify the acceptance of continental drift, by finding a 220-million-year-old fossil of a Lystrosaurus." I suppose this is history now and his work is outdated so people do not pay as much attention to his books as they use to. Still his discovery had a lot to do with the acceptance of the continental drift theory. He provided some of the early evidence for the theory.
I made it clear that I was joking about how you can buy forgeries. Ebay sells lots and lots of forgeries. You can buy all the stone arrow heads you would ever want, but when you get them you will find tool marks from modern tools. They do not even try to make them look real. Although I hear of people what will clean up the tool marks and bury them in the back yard for the winter, then dig them up in the spring and take them out and sell them as the real thing.
In Darwin's day people manufactured forgeries to profit off of Darwin's theory. Even Darwin was selling books and making a nice living off of trying to promote a theory he learned from his Grandfather. When someone is making money you can be sure that others are going to try to jump on their bandwagon and cash in on the profit.
Yet the Bible has remained unchanged for over 3500 years. Maybe more people understand more then what it use to be.
You still can't explain why the small dinosaurs did not survive.
How much of the species to ever live are now extinct? Is it so hard to believe that they just died off like many other species? I would say climate change and hunting had a huge part in it.
Many species died off in several extinction events. The Permian/Triassic was probably the worst one.
Why is it so hard to believe that a major extinction event was caused by a massive meteor impact 65 million years ago?
Because it's not in scripture. It's my stance that the strata was not layed out over billions of years but by one massive event, the flood.
What?
Yet the Bible has remained unchanged for over 3500 years. Maybe more people understand more then what it use to be.
How much of the species to ever live are now extinct? Is it so hard to believe that they just died off like many other species? I would say climate change and hunting had a huge part in it.
Yet the Bible has remained unchanged for over 3500 years. Maybe more people understand more then what it use to be.
I agree, evolution is a theory. However, it is taught as fact in grade schools and post secondary schools of all levels.Evolution is a theory. Science is the method.
I agree, evolution is a theory. However, it is taught as fact in grade schools and post secondary schools of all levels.
Anyone of any accreditation, that proposes any other theory on the origin of life as we know it is ridiculed, slandered, mocked and can lose funding, accreditation, employment or ranking in this world of "changing science".
I agree, evolution is a theory. However, it is taught as fact in grade schools and post secondary schools of all levels.
Anyone of any accreditation, that proposes any other theory on the origin of life as we know it is ridiculed, slandered, mocked and can lose funding, accreditation, employment or ranking in this world of "changing science".
I believe that in the end, this changing science will come to rest on the same place as the unchanging truth of the word of God.
I agree, evolution is a theory. However, it is taught as fact in grade schools and post secondary schools of all levels.
They have a mixture of features from earlier and later species. They are transitional by definition.
From the National Academies of Science:
Is Evolution a Theory or a Fact?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?