Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
A link is evidence if it is germane to the topic at hand. Now you did not understand it, I can see how that might be frustrating. I could help you to understand it if you would like to discuss the article.You didn't offer evidence, only a link, in response to my request for evidence, based on the scientific method, for the 'how' of Darwinist evolution. Links aren't evidence.
Try again.
A link is evidence if it is germane to the topic at hand.
Now you did not understand it, I can see how that might be frustrating. I could help you to understand it if you would like to discuss the article.
And since you don't understand the concept of evidence you are in no position to say what is and what is not evidence. I guess I need to remind you that learning what evidence is has always frightened you.
No it's not. The scientific method requires much more than a link.
Simply show, in the link, evidence based on the scientific method for the 'how' of Darwinist evolution. You've made the claim, now support it.
I don't need to remind you of your continual failure to offer evidence, based on the scientific method, for the 'how' of Darwinist evolution. Every post of yours should remind you.
No, the scientific method only tells us how that they had to do their work. It says nothing about using links in debates. Congratulations, you just showed that you do not understand the scientific method once again.
Explain what you mean by this phrase.
Since I never failed I do not see how you could remind anyone of anything. But try again.
I am here only to help people understand why they loss the debate over one hundred years ago. The simple fact is that all of the evidence found so far supports the theory of evolution.
Nope, if you had defined your nonsense phrase I would not be asking again. It is so nice to see you pull up your pretty picture that you do not understand again.Scientific method.....
Now, show this process used in in your link for the 'how' of Darwinist evolution.
I've explained it several times in my posts.
Not a single bit of evidence, based on the scientific method, has been given by you or anyone else to support the view that only naturalistic mechanisms produced humanity, as well as all life, from an alleged single life form of long ago.
And an explanation is given to you once again.....this is dozens of times now.
You didn't offer evidence, only a link, in response to my request for evidence, based on the scientific method, for the 'how' of Darwinist evolution. Links aren't evidence.
Try again.
You were evading simply giving the evidence asked for. As you've done in this post. And will do in the next one.
And the next one.
See above.As is common, you subtly attempt to change my request. I'm asking for evidence, based on the scientific method, for the Darwinist view that only naturalistic mechanisms produced humanity, as well as all life we observe today, from an alleged single life form of long ago. The evasive response will be to offer something about common ancestry and then claim evidence was offered. It wasn't. That wasn't the request.
Here you go again attempting to subtly change the issue. The issue is about the 'how', the process claimed by Darwinists which produced humanity from an alleged single life form of long ago. All you have is a faith-based view, void of evidence, for the 'how'. You believe it was a Godless, willy-nilly process, but that's nothing but a personal view by you. It's not based on the scientific method.
Bickering? I would hardly call it bickering, intentional ignorance brought on by an unwillingness to learn perhaps but bickering? no.ENOUGH WITH THE BICKERING!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?