Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Did someone say that it was not useful?
Then what were you suggesting from this:
"BTW, how about evolutionists that depend on grants and a salary from companies, universities that promote evolution. Especially, when they require a belief in evolution as a prerequisite for a job?"Evolution is a useful science. Ergo, it's both taught and funded for that reason.
Life from Nonlife
“Life comes from life” is a fundamental law of biology, and yet formation of the first living thing must violate this law. How this could happen still stumps scientists.
Information of Life
Life consists of more than all the physical parts working in unison—it requires the information to run the parts. Scientists still don’t understand where this information could have come from.
Irreducible Complexity
Darwinian evolution requires that every complex component of life arose step-by-step. The discoveries of genetics and cell biology have highlighted this impossibility, which scientists still can't explain.
And of course I do not know of any university that requires one to accept evolution.
It's a list of identified fossils for Perissodactyls or Perissodactyl-like fossils, including Orohippus, Hyracotherium, and Radinskya, among others.
I still do not see it. This is a chart about the horse from the source that you referenced, why would it not show on the chart?
Then what were you suggesting from this:
"BTW, how about evolutionists that depend on grants and a salary from companies, universities that promote evolution. Especially, when they require a belief in evolution as a prerequisite for a job?"Evolution is a useful science. Ergo, it's both taught and funded for that reason.
Oh my, the subject was about bias from evolutionist and creationist and equate that as me claiming that evolutionary biology is not useful, really? That is logical for you, is it?
BTW, if it is any clearer for you, my question, which you did not answer, was about biases in the workplace, that is what I was suggesting.
That chart cuts off at 55 million years ago. The site I directed to you includes fossils from earlier than that.
I'm still not sure what you're not seeing?
That is OK, I fail to see you answer my questions but I can understand why.I just fail to see where the "bias" you are suggesting is coming from though
OK, what is the species that evolved into the Eohippus? Yes, it did, but where did it say, and show evidence of any of those fossils evolving into an Eohippus?
Why the fixation on Eohippus? Do you realize that gaps are expected in the fossil record, especially of land based animals?OK, what is the species that evolved into the Eohippus? Yes, it did, but where did it say, and show evidence of any of those fossils evolving into an Eohippus?
That is OK, I fail to see you answer my questions but I can understand why.
So you have no answer for my question, just as I thought. I did appreciate the honesty from Jimmy's answer to the question. I did research the fossils and there was no verifiable evidence of them evolving into a horse.You'll want to research Phenacodontidae fossils from the Paleocene epoch.
I did research the fossils and there was no verifiable evidence of them evolving into a horse.
Sorry but you are in no position to make such a claim. This is another honesty fail on your part.So you have no answer for my question, just as I thought. I did appreciate the honesty from Jimmy's answer to the question. I did research the fossils and there was no verifiable evidence of them evolving into a horse.
Bolded for attention.
IF, we were talking about creation and the only source I would accept as authentic and the only sources that I quoted were from Bible believing Christian sites, would you accept my data without question?
There are many different breeds but they are still horses.
"Dawn horse (genus Hyracotherium), extinct group of horses that flourished in North America and Europe during the early part of the Eocene Epoch (55.8–33.9 million years ago). Even though these animals are more commonly known as Eohippus, a name given by the American paleontologist Othniel Charles Marsh, they are properly placed in the genus Hyracotherium, the name given earlier by British paleontologist Richard Owen."
So what did the Hyracotherium "evolve" from, what evidence that can be verified?
OK, does anyone know, do you have any verifiable evidence or did Eohippus just magically appear and then "evolution" took over from there?
Has there been any different species coming from the Equus caballus and if so what evidence?
Radinskya looks like a candidate for a pre-horse species, albeit fossil evidence is a bit scant. And the ancestors of perissodactyls were likely from the phenacodontids clade, or something similar to it based on the morphological similarities between early perissodactyls and phenacodontids.
There are gaps in the fossil record, thus its difficult to find exact unbroken lineages for every clade especially given the time period in question when there was a mass extinction of the dinosaurs and subsequent radiation of the mammals.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?