Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Lucy: More Fraud
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mistermystery" data-source="post: 26553120" data-attributes="member: 32930"><p>So instead of adressing the issue you dismiss it by saying it has nothing to do with evolution. Tell me Johnny, How do you explain genetics without the theory of evolution?</p><p></p><p>Also, if evolution and genetics have got nothing in common, please be so friendly to inform Edward B. Lewis, Christiane Nüsslein-Volhard, Eric F. Wieschaus that they had it all wrong, and they should give back their nobel prize. Or is investegation on the genetics in fruitfly development not "geneticy" or "evilutionary" enough for you?</p><p> </p><p> No, you're right there. The evidence in favour of evolution makes it true, and the funny thing is that so far you can't seem to bring yourself to even awnser my post. I also welcome the offer that you write a big letter to <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/08/060801230141.htm" target="_blank">various </a><a href="http://statgen.ncsu.edu/brcwebsite/home.php" target="_blank">genetic-scientists </a>and say they should stop their research, because they're wrong.</p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>I'm sorry, but it's pretty ignorant to say that disease-research nowadays isn't evolutionary related, but it's even more laughable to say that genetics and evolution are unrelated. Offer your proof that they are unrelated, and please be so kind why you still can't name one practical application the Gap-theory has contributed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mistermystery, post: 26553120, member: 32930"] So instead of adressing the issue you dismiss it by saying it has nothing to do with evolution. Tell me Johnny, How do you explain genetics without the theory of evolution? Also, if evolution and genetics have got nothing in common, please be so friendly to inform Edward B. Lewis, Christiane Nüsslein-Volhard, Eric F. Wieschaus that they had it all wrong, and they should give back their nobel prize. Or is investegation on the genetics in fruitfly development not "geneticy" or "evilutionary" enough for you? No, you're right there. The evidence in favour of evolution makes it true, and the funny thing is that so far you can't seem to bring yourself to even awnser my post. I also welcome the offer that you write a big letter to [URL="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/08/060801230141.htm"]various [/URL][URL="http://statgen.ncsu.edu/brcwebsite/home.php"]genetic-scientists [/URL]and say they should stop their research, because they're wrong. --- I'm sorry, but it's pretty ignorant to say that disease-research nowadays isn't evolutionary related, but it's even more laughable to say that genetics and evolution are unrelated. Offer your proof that they are unrelated, and please be so kind why you still can't name one practical application the Gap-theory has contributed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Lucy: More Fraud
Top
Bottom