Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
How does God not making a distinction between good and evil have anything to do with predestination? Every one of us is evil in our natural state, after all.
Because evil cannot exist if God predetermines everything.
Rising Spirit in post #39:
" And predestination, et. al., make hearers uncomfortable."
Predestinationist: "There is a good chance that your soul is irrevocably lost."
Yes, I can see that would make folks uncomfortable.
Why did Christ call for repentance if people are not able to repent?
When you proclaim the Gospel to someone, calling has been made.
You do nothing more. Once you proclaim the Gospel it (Calling) has occurred !
The calling is the Gospel.
If the hearer is unregenerate, that calling will be dismissed.
If the hearer is regenerate, that calling shall ultimately result in their repentance and faith.
We don't know. It's the same Gospel for BOTH !
The Gospel is the calling !
We do the calling (Romans 10:14c). Whereas regeneration is done by the Holy Spirit.
Calling uses means (Gospel). Regeneration does not use means (it's supernatural).
Because evil cannot exist if God predetermines everything. An evil act invokes the finality of good, and by extension cannot be an evil act.
Interesting point.
The following quote is from a book by Stefan Zweig, available on The GOSPEL TRUTH of God's Character, Law, Government and Gospel, on the life of John Calvin.
<< Bolsec, generally respected as family doctor to the leading patricians in Geneva, had openly attacked the weakest and most vulnerable point of Calvin's teaching, the rigid doctrine of predestination, using the argument that Erasmus had used against Luther. It was impossible, declared both these "heretics," that God, as the principle of all good, could wittingly and willingly impel human beings to perform their worst deeds. Everyone knows how infuriated Luther was by Erasmus's reasoning, and what a flood of abuse the most noted champion of the Reformation, this master of coarse invective, let loose against the elderly sage. >>
Link:
http://www.gospeltruth.net/heresy/heresy_chap5.htm
*
*
I have been on many different threads about this. What God has taught me is that He has "predestined according to His foreknowledge". That is what the scripture says in
Romans 8:29
29 For whom He foreknew, He also predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son, that He might be the firstborn among many brethren.
God knew who would come to know Him, since He knows past present and future, He predestined according to it.
I have been on many different threads about this. What God has taught me is that He has "predestined according to His foreknowledge". That is what the scripture says in
Romans 8:29
29 For whom He foreknew, He also predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son, that He might be the firstborn among many brethren.
your so close! Rom.8:29, 30 is accepted as being one of the great sedes doctrinae of "predestination." You got the main thought of this passage being God's provident care, and the main object of it comfort and assurance in regard to that care. The irony is that predestination is not at all elucidated except dealing with prooridzein explained later.
Rom.8:29, "because whom he foreknew he also FOREORDAINED to be conformed to the image of his Son..." Most don't even have a chance trying to receive a valid grammatical and contextual interpretation due to so many fallacious interpretations. Proginwskein = pro + ginwskein = to know in advance = "to foreknow," which you got. The same is valid with regard to prooridzein, to ordain in advance, to predestine. How far back pro reaches is not debated, for we all agree that these divine acts go back to eternity. Now my end point:
"Foreknew" and "foreordained" cannot be synonymous. Prooridzein = "to foreordain," and proorismos = "foreordination." This is an act of the will; by it God in eternity fixed, settled, and determined that those whom he already recognized in agape as his own should be such as are conformed to the image of his Son.
There is, indeed, a conformitas crucis which we attain in this life, and some would combine it with the conformitas gloriae to be attained at the last day. But Paul is pointing his readers from their sufferings to their comfort amid trials and to their assured hope, and this means to their coming glory. Hope this helps?
You are stating the predestinationist position. I have seen no reason to believe it.
Regeneration may be supernatural but the Bible tells us that people can ask God for regeneration.
*
*
Here's all you need to know about predestination (all emphasis is mine):
Ephesians 1
2 Grace be to you, and peace, from God our Father, and from the Lord Jesus Christ.
3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ:
4 According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love:
5 Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will,
6 To the praise of the glory of his grace, wherein he hath made us accepted in the beloved.
7 In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of his grace;
8 Wherein he hath abounded toward us in all wisdom and prudence;
9 Having made known unto us the mystery of his will, according to his good pleasure which he hath purposed in himself:
10 That in the dispensation of the fulness of times he might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven, and which are on earth; even in him:
11 In whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will:
12 That we should be to the praise of his glory, who first trusted in Christ.
no one argues the idea of God choosing.
The question is, who is chosen? individuals? or a corporate election, i.e. Christians, all those who are and will be in Christ?
Then that would not really be predestination in the Biblical sense, since it would depend upon something we do. It would make salvation be something we have earned.
I have been on many different threads about this. What God has taught me is that He has "predestined according to His foreknowledge". That is what the scripture says in
Romans 8:29
29 For whom He foreknew, He also predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son, that He might be the firstborn among many brethren.
your so close! Rom.8:29, 30 is accepted as being one of the great sedes doctrinae of "predestination." You got the main thought of this passage being God's provident care, and the main object of it comfort and assurance in regard to that care. The irony is that predestination is not at all elucidated except dealing with prooridzein explained later.
Rom.8:29, "because whom he foreknew he also FOREORDAINED to be conformed to the image of his Son..." Most don't even have a chance trying to receive a valid grammatical and contextual interpretation due to so many fallacious interpretations. Proginwskein = pro + ginwskein = to know in advance = "to foreknow," which you got. The same is valid with regard to prooridzein, to ordain in advance, to predestine. How far back pro reaches is not debated, for we all agree that these divine acts go back to eternity. Now my end point:
"Foreknew" and "foreordained" cannot be synonymous. Prooridzein = "to foreordain," and proorismos = "foreordination." This is an act of the will; by it God in eternity fixed, settled, and determined that those whom he already recognized in agape as his own should be such as are conformed to the image of his Son.
There is, indeed, a conformitas crucis which we attain in this life, and some would combine it with the conformitas gloriae to be attained at the last day. But Paul is pointing his readers from their sufferings to their comfort amid trials and to their assured hope, and this means to their coming glory. Hope this helps?
I don't really understand what your trying to teach me here?
Shturt678 and Allykelly07 have both referred to Romans 8. Here's what I found in that Chapter.
12 So then, brethren, we are debtors, not to the flesh, to live according to the flesh 13 for if you live according to the flesh you will die, but if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body you will live.
--Romans 8:12-13 RSV
12-13 So then, my brothers, you can see that we have no particular reason to feel grateful to our sensual nature, or to live life on the level of the instincts. Indeed that way of living leads to certain spiritual death. But if on the other hand you cut the nerve of your instinctive actions by obeying the Spirit, you are on the way to real living.
--Romans 8:12-13 Phillips
These passages clearly put some responsibility on mortals, on the believer.
*
*
I don't really understand what your trying to teach me here?
I don't even understand my own inference so how can I expect others to grasp ... lies on me .... thank you for your patience.
Just remove "predestined" from Rom.8:29 and insert "foreordained" and you will make an ol' old Lutheran very happy.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?