- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,213
- 52,661
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Huh???Those 11 questions are never going to get answered, are they?
It is looking like this will be the case
Put av1611vet on your ignore list. All he does is derail threads.
Yea, notice how I never replied to him...
Defender of the Faith would be a more appropriate title.Am I to undersand that Kent Hovind is considered some kind of hero here?
The fake doctor who withheld his taxes.the fake Dr who withheld his taxes?
That Kent Hovind.that Kent Hovind?
Huh???
What have I got to do with those 11 questions not getting answered?
I think you can retire that term here, Cab.Oh, lying for Jesus is now considered "defending the faith"? That's news to me.
You have many replies in this thread, none of which answer any of the questions in the OP. That's what you have to do with the answers.
I think you can retire that term here, Cab.
It's so sterile, Mr. Clean would be envious.
Even I've been accused of that.
No.Do you tell lies to defend your faith?
Though AV is not exactly honest at times it is hard to catch him in an actual lie.No.
What kind of question is that?
My faith stands solid and is anchored within the veil by the Captain of my salvation.
Yours?
I agree, the last thing Christianity is is 'the religion of love', Christianity is the religion for the selfish and the egotist, they think there is a God that is there solely for them, for them it's just one long ego trip, it's just a pity it's all in their minds.
If there was a God I'm sure that God would not go searching for the dumb and the gullable people of this world.
It was St. Augustine, the original saying is "with love for mankind and hatred of sins".
I sincerely ask these to learn how you address them and your reasoning.
7) Why is there no single continuous section of the flood anywhere on Earth?
As the global flood waters recede they would break down into multiple thousands of large and small 'local floods', which is what is evidenced on the surface of the earth. The more, and varied, land area a flood effects the less likely uniform evidence will be found. Also deposition and sorting of the same material can occur multiple times during a very large flood. Science is looking for something that isn't there.
As the global flood waters recede they would break down into multiple thousands of large and small 'local floods', which is what is evidenced on the surface of the earth. The more, and varied, land area a flood effects the less likely uniform evidence will be found. Also deposition and sorting of the same material can occur multiple times during a very large flood. Science is looking for something that isn't there.
Except for the fact that we can date those. They did not happen 4,500 years ago.
Except for the fact that we can date those. They did not happen 4,500 years ago.
You cannot date them accurately. Too much evidence has been lost in the past 4,000 or so years.
Except for the fact that we can date those. They did not happen 4,500 years ago.
You can only date certain kinds of rock and those dates are based on assumptions. We have discussed this before.
You can only date certain kinds of rock and those dates are based on assumptions. We have discussed this before.
What assumptions? That the world hasn't fundamentally changed in the past 4000 years?
What assumptions? That the world hasn't fundamentally changed in the past 4000 years?
What the heck?
Your quote is in error. I did not make that statement, E,D. did.
You can only date certain kinds of rock and those dates are based on assumptions. We have discussed this before.
As lasthero said "What assumptions"?
You do know that radiometric dating is very well established., don't you?
What the heck?
Your quote is in error. I did not make that statement, E,D. did.
Weird stuff happens when you quote ED sometimes.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?