• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Status
Not open for further replies.

EternalDragon

Counselor
Jul 31, 2013
5,757
26
✟28,767.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican

Does the bible say Jesus is the second (last) Adam? Does it say he
was around 30 years old when he received the holy ghost and started
his ministry?

Yes or no?

When is a man in his prime? Around 30 years of age? Yes or no?

Common sense and logic need to prevail here in light of what the
scriptures say.
 
Upvote 0

lewiscalledhimmaster

georgemacdonald.info
Nov 8, 2012
2,499
56
67
Scotland
Visit site
✟60,423.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Politics
UK-Greens
Do you think that the Bible and/or reality must adjust itself to what you find appropriate?

Huh? You were the one who said, 'Reading Gen 1 and 2, I see no passage that shows that Adam couldn't have been created as a baby and then lived 30 years before he got married.'

I didn't disagree with you, I merely stated, 'That's perhaps a bit too liberal, even for my palette.' and searched the Scripture to see if one might extrapolate such a view.

Now to your commentary, of the 1st passage:

26 Then God said, “Let us make man[h] in our image, after our likeness. NASB

And this equates to adults? How so? And surely, the level of PHYSICAL development can't be said to be in the image of God. After all, I don't see God as having gone through puberty, or having to shave his beard, or having to wash his hair.

Let's have a little context too:

26 Then God said, “Let us make man[h] in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.”

The Hebrew word for man (adam) is the generic term for mankind and becomes the proper name Adam

It does seem like a more general account, of the creation of mankind -- or am I missing something? There is no deliberate emphasis on the exact age when they began to exist, or for that matter whether they were babies or not. My guess is this is a very general statement, from which one cannot extrapolate either or claims. Perhaps one of the other passages might support your idea better. I dunno, I'm not the expert exegetic.

Sidebar:
'....Medieval theologians strongly distinguished “image” and “likeness,” with “image” viewed as a reference to natural reason, and “likeness” as a reference to the original righteousness lost in the Fall. More recent scholarship notes that the two Hebrew terms are used synonymously in Scripture (v. 27; 5:1, 3; 9:6).' (from The Reformation Study Bible)
 
Upvote 0

Gracchus

Senior Veteran
Dec 21, 2002
7,199
821
California
Visit site
✟38,182.00
Faith
Pantheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
When is a man in his prime? Around 30 years of age? Yes or no?
That isn't a "yes or no" question. (Jesus had some things to say about lawyers.) A man is in his prime morally at about three. (Never trust anyone over 4.) He is in his prime sexually at about 16. He is in his prime physically at about 25. He is in his prime intellectually, if he is careful, industrious and lucky, at 70 or above.

 
Upvote 0

lewiscalledhimmaster

georgemacdonald.info
Nov 8, 2012
2,499
56
67
Scotland
Visit site
✟60,423.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Politics
UK-Greens

'....In a survey of adults, ages 25 to 74, participants were asked a wide variety of questions dealing with many aspects of life. The results show that those in midlife have a generally youthful outlook and a high level of happiness. ....'

New Studies Middle Age Is The Prime of Life - NY TIMES (1999) : New Study Finds Middle Age Is Prime of Life - NYTimes.com
 
Upvote 0

lewiscalledhimmaster

georgemacdonald.info
Nov 8, 2012
2,499
56
67
Scotland
Visit site
✟60,423.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Politics
UK-Greens
Lines of Evidence : Homologies : Anatomy (Part 2)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87_shPJxdns

'Hoatzin chicks have claws on their wings, as do some chickens and ostriches. This reflects the fact that bird ancestors had clawed hands.'



"ALRIGHTY THEN!" It's time to move on, with the next exciting part of our journey into Understanding Evolution, Baby!

Lines of Evidence: Homologies : Comparative Anatomy

'....Whales and hummingbirds have tetrapod skeletons inherited from a common ancestor. Their bodies have been modified and parts have been lost through natural selection, resulting in adaptation to their respective lifestyles over millions of years. On the surface, these animals look very different, but the relationship between them is easy to demonstrate. ....'

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCx-nwkj8fU
Evolution : Giant Whales : BBC Science
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5GfXnqcZE8
The Diversity and Evolution of Hummingbirds by Joseph Morlan
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

You really need to read better.

I stated the authors of the gospels are ANONYMOUS.

If you have studied the work of scholars and historians, you will know this is a widely accepted conclusion, even by many conservative scholars.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
42,395
45,526
Los Angeles Area
✟1,012,287.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Common sense and logic need to prevail here in light of what the scriptures say.

If you can stick an age of Adam into the bible, why can't you stick an age of the earth (say a few billion years) into the bible?

Common sense, logic, and evidence need to prevail here.
 
Upvote 0

lewiscalledhimmaster

georgemacdonald.info
Nov 8, 2012
2,499
56
67
Scotland
Visit site
✟60,423.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Politics
UK-Greens
You really need to read better.

I stated the authors of the gospels are ANONYMOUS.

I'm sure you have, elsewhere.

If you have studied the work of scholars and historians, you will know this is a widely accepted conclusion, even by many conservative scholars.

Of course, but that is not what you wrote here.
 
Upvote 0

lewiscalledhimmaster

georgemacdonald.info
Nov 8, 2012
2,499
56
67
Scotland
Visit site
✟60,423.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Politics
UK-Greens
If you can stick an age of Adam into the bible, why can't you stick an age of the earth (say a few billion years) into the bible?

Common sense, logic, and evidence need to prevail here.

That'd be 4004 BC. (said with a Bob Newhart accent and wink)

Though the NT book titled 'John' is dated Anno Domini 26, the context of the opening section from verse 1 to verse 18 -- might well not only be the place for such, but even a date that cannot be written. i.e. In the beginning was the Word.
 
Upvote 0

lewiscalledhimmaster

georgemacdonald.info
Nov 8, 2012
2,499
56
67
Scotland
Visit site
✟60,423.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Politics
UK-Greens
What did I write?

I don't know, trying using the back-link on your posts 'and see how deep the rabbit hole goes'
It's good to know that we're on the same page, with regard to certain of the books of the NT.

Applying the same, how do you rate the letters of St. Paul -- say for example the book of 'Galatians'? Authorship, age etc. ?
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

If you don't know what I wrote, why would you claim; "that isn't what you wrote"?

As to your other question, that was asked and answered some time ago.
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,143
Visit site
✟98,025.00
Faith
Agnostic
Removing science from the classroom would be catastrophic. How would we educate chemists, engineers of all types, biologists, doctors etc.... all of which MUST believe in the TOE to be applicable????

Biologists apply the theory of evolution every day. New biological research would be impossible without it.

Every time you try to belittle science you only prove our point.


How many Canadian biologists are publishing original research in the biological sciences based on creationism? We can widen it to the whole world, if you want. Show me biologists who are doing research at this moment based on creationism.


None of those things are based on creationism.

Look at the US. Removed God from the schools and now is destined to collapse under the weight of it's unbearable debt, crime, corruption and the cost of protecting itself from nations all around the globe.

Did someone show up and lead God out of schools in handcuffs? Is God so powerless that puny humans can remove him from buildings? Have creationists really elevated themselves to the level of God?

The middle east is an extension of what you are trying to protect. ONE LESSON, ONE TRUTH. OUR WAY.

The middle east teaches creationism in schools and does not teach evolution. It is a model of what you want.
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,143
Visit site
✟98,025.00
Faith
Agnostic

In order for Adam to be in his prime, does it require zircons to have a Uranium to Lead ratio consistent with billions of years of decay? Why would life on Earth need specific ratios of rare isotopes in rocks in order for it to survive?
 
Upvote 0

lewiscalledhimmaster

georgemacdonald.info
Nov 8, 2012
2,499
56
67
Scotland
Visit site
✟60,423.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Politics
UK-Greens
If you don't know what I wrote, why would you claim; "that isn't what you wrote"?

As to your other question, that was asked and answered some time ago.

You obviously don't recognize sarcasm.
No harm.
 
Upvote 0

lewiscalledhimmaster

georgemacdonald.info
Nov 8, 2012
2,499
56
67
Scotland
Visit site
✟60,423.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Politics
UK-Greens
Back peddling?

Please point out the sarcasm in post 368#

Not at all.
You know what you wrote and what you didn't write, and if you want to delude yourself - no problem.
Now you getting the idea. It helps to read and remember what you wrote, or else you'll drown in a localized flood of self-pity.

G O O D B Y E
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

You are claiming I am deluding myself?

Go ahead and prove your point then, if you desire to place another label on another person. You have done this before and when asked to substantiate your label, you begin posting cartoons in response and substantiated nothing.

This seems to be a pattern with you and does little for credibility.
 
Upvote 0

[serious]

'As we treat the least of our brothers...' RIP GA
Site Supporter
Aug 29, 2006
15,100
1,716
✟95,346.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married

Are you sure you didn't just misread what he wrote? Looking back at it, it looks like you thought he was arguing for biblical literalism due to direct divine authorship, but that isn't his position at all nor have I seen any trace of him ever saying anything like that. If you misread, it's not a big deal, we all do that sometimes.

To be honest, your reaction here is just confusing.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.