Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Why do you insert your views into a conversation that does not include you?And yes, you are right that it is commentary. She avoided including all the rest of the Scriptures that bear on this use of her text. She did not intend to show her hermeneutic and full exegesis. But go ahead and correct her.
I guess I need to know what you think I have presented which the verses do not say there before I can adequately respond.Interesting that you present what you say rather than what the verses say.
Be that as it may, is your commentary sound?
Do not discourage him. . .his additions are always more than welcome.Why do you insert your views into a conversation that does not include you?
Were we not discussing Ro 3:25. . .do you not know what Ro 3:25-26 says? Can you not click on it here?Interesting that you present what you say rather than what the verses say.
Be that as it may, is your commentary sound?
The verses sayI guess I need to know what you think I have presented which the verses do not say there before I can adequately respond.
It seems to me the egg was never available.The human analogy doesn't do justice to the facts, but to play along:
Dad makes breakfast. His son hates eggs. He invites his son to eat, and his son says, "no". Turns out, knowing his son hates eggs, his dad didn't waste an egg on someone who would only say, "no" —he didn't cook one for his son. —One kind of "son".
I can't see how this would be similar to the atonement being available for all.Dad makes breakfast. His son hates eggs. He, knowing his son hates eggs, cooks him one anyway, and then changes his son's mind and preferences to love eggs. —The other kind of "son".
Well, no. In the one case the atonement is applied ("the atonement is made"), and in the other it was "offered".
An example of the logic: God warned Israel of their impending captivity, but they ignored the warning. God had already prepared Cyrus to lay waste the people and take them captive, and that, not by his obedience, but by his pride and self-esteem. Then God showed Cyrus what's what!
Yes, that is the common way to discuss Scripture.It should not surprise you that one can both quote the verses one intends to comment upon and also provide one's commentary.
First of all let me apologize because I completely messed up that last post because I had to stop mid post to do something at work and when I came back to finish it I completely reversed what I was originally trying to say. Let me clarify my position please. Atonement or at least the Greek word used in Romans 5:11 refers to reconciliation or justification, it is not used in reference to Christ’s sacrifice on the cross. It can’t be used interchangeably because Christ’s sacrifice paid for the sins of all men but did not justify all men. All men can be reconciled to God but they are not automatically reconciled to Him thru Christ’s sacrifice. His sacrifice merely allowed all men to be reconciled to Him. As for the OT I haven’t explored all the verses you quoted but so far none of the ones I have checked use the same Greek word that is used in Romans 5 in the Septuagint. I’m not going to say they all don’t because I haven’t had time to check all of them.I think that how Romans 5:11 reads depends on the translation used.
Romans 5:11 And, what is more, we can boast of God’s protection; always through our Lord Jesus Christ, since it is through him that we have attained our reconciliation.In the Catholic Public Domain Version "atonement" is used quote a lot in the old testament.
Atonement in the old testament pointed to the cross and the shed blood of our Lord, Jesus Christ.
- Exodus 29:36 and you shall offer a calf for sin on each day, as an atonement. And you shall cleanse the altar when you will have immolated the victim of expiation, and you shall anoint it for sanctification.
- Exodus 30:10 And Aaron shall pray over its horns once a year, with the blood of what was offered for sin. And he shall make atonement over it in your generations. It shall be the Holy of holies to the Lord."
- Leviticus 5:13 praying for him and making atonement. Yet truly, the remaining part he himself shall have as a gift.
- Leviticus 16:30 On this day, there shall be atonement for you, and also a cleansing from all your sins. You shall be cleansed in the sight of the Lord.
- Leviticus 16:32 And the priest who has been anointed, and whose hands have been consecrated to exercise the priesthood in the place of his father, shall make atonement. And he shall be clothed with the linen robe and the holy vestments.
- Leviticus 23:27 The tenth day of this seventh month shall be the day of atonement; it shall be most honored, and it shall be called holy. And you shall afflict your souls on that day, and you shall offer a holocaust to the Lord.
- Leviticus 25:9 And you shall sound the trumpet in the seventh month, on the tenth day of the month, at the time of the atonement, throughout all your land.
- Nehemiah 10:33 for the bread of the presence, and for the continual sacrifice, and for a continual holocaust on the Sabbaths, on the new moons, on the solemnities, and for the holy things, and for the sin offering, so that atonement would be made for Israel, and for every use within the house of our God.
Isaiah 43:3 For I am the Lord your God, the Holy One of Israel, your Saviour. I have presented Egypt as your atonement, Ethiopia and Seba on your behalf.- Daniel 9:9 But to you, the Lord our God, is mercy and atonement, for we have withdrawn from you,
- Sirach 7:36 And reach out your hand to the poor, so that your atonement and your blessing may be perfected.
I don’t see how this analogy can be used in the situation of Christ’s sacrifice because His sacrifice was for the whole world. So this would be more like dad cooking eggs for the whole family but he only made some of them like eggs? Then why did he cook eggs for the whole family?Dad makes breakfast. His son hates eggs. He, knowing his son hates eggs, cooks him one anyway, and then changes his son's mind and preferences to love eggs. —The other kind of "son".
Green's translation of Ro 3:25-26, in the Textus Receptus Greek text (exceptionally corrupt in Rev):The verses say
25 God has offered him to us as a means of reconciliation, in virtue of faith, ransoming us with his blood. Thus God has vindicated his own holiness, shewing us why he overlooked our former sins26 in the days of his forbearance; and he has also vindicated the holiness of Jesus Christ, here and now, as one who is himself holy, and imparts holiness to those who take their stand upon faith in him.✻✻ The Greek text here can be, and commonly is, translated thus: ‘he has also vindicated his (God’s) holiness, here and now, as one who is himself holy, and imparts holiness to those who take their stand upon faith in Jesus Christ’. The other interpretation is, apparently, that of the Latin translators.
Atonement (hilasterion) is the "cover" of the Ark on which the blood was sprinkled for cleansing on the Day of Atonement.First of all let me apologize because I completely messed up that last post because I had to stop mid post to do something at work and when I came back to finish it I completely reversed what I was originally trying to say. Let me clarify my position please. Atonement or at least the Greek word used in Romans 5:11 refers to reconciliation or justification, it is not used in reference to Christ’s sacrifice on the cross. It can’t be used interchangeably
You wrote: "for the sins committed beforehand (by the OT saints)" but this is supposition. Beforehand does not imply old testament saints.My exposition of Ro 3:25-26:
Christ's sacrifice was to:
1) demonstrate he is just, in two regards:
----a) for the sins committed beforehand (by the OT saints) that in his forbearance he had left unpunished,
----b) for the sins committed at the present time, (in both cases) so as to be just, and
2) to be the justifier, to be the one who (both) exacts/requires justice and the one who also satisfies that justice and declares forensically righteous those who have faith in Jesus.
It does when the cross is the reference point in regard to paying for sin. . .before cross were unpaid for until the cross, after cross are paid.You wrote: "for the sins committed beforehand (by the OT saints)" but this is supposition. Beforehand does not imply old testament saints.
Oops!. . .they identify the parallel phrases in the texts. . .for seeing the differences among the same phrases.The colour coding that you applied to my post is confusing because you offered no explanation of what the colours are intended to mean.
The word atonement only exists in one verse in the NT. Romans 5:11. Propitiation is the payment or offering that was made for our sins, and not only our sins but the sins of the whole world. Atonement is our reconciliation to God, our justification which is exclusive to those who have embraced Christ. Atonement and propitiation are not the same thing.Atonement (hilasterion) is the "cover" of the Ark on which the blood was sprinkled for cleansing on the Day of Atonement.
In Ro 3:25, "by his blood" is in immediate connection with "propitiation."
Christ through his atoning death on the cross is the (Personal) means by whom God shows the mercy of his justifying grace to the sinner who believes.
It doesn't. What has that to do with what we are talking about?It should not surprise you that one can both quote the verses one intends to comment upon and also provide one's commentary.
So?. . .how many times must the word of God state it before it is true?The word atonement only exists in one verse in the NT.
Atonement is not reconciliation, it is propitiation, expiation, satisfaction. . .the result of which satisfaction is reconciliation.Romans 5:11. Propitiation is the payment or offering that was made for our sins, and not only our sins but the sins of the whole world. Atonement is our reconciliation to God, our justification which is exclusive to those who have embraced Christ. Atonement and propitiation are not the same thing.
Because, it concerns me. It's on the forum. Why does it bother you? I took a shower just this morning!Why do you insert your views into a conversation that does not include you?
OkIt seems to me the egg was never available.
I say what I did as a concession to the use many people make of certain verses. If they want to say that God made people able to choose to accept or reject him apart from his work in their heart, since he died "for" them all, I've argued the "for" till I'm blue in the face. So I try to demonstrate a way even their arrangement still doesn't mean he paid for the sins of absolutely everyone. So: In a sense, yes, the atonement is made 'for' everyone; they do, after all, choose to reject it...I can't see how this would be similar to the atonement being available for all.
He didn't. The Scriptures do not say that he did.I don’t see how this analogy can be used in the situation of Christ’s sacrifice because His sacrifice was for the whole world. So this would be more like dad cooking eggs for the whole family but he only made some of them like eggs? Then why did he cook eggs for the whole family?
You flatter me to suggest that I am the translator who produced the text quoted in my posts. It is, of course, not mine. It is the work of Ronald Knox.discrepancies in your text.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?