Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It was shared on line.
Open source.
The question then, is why it wasn't followed up on.
Many of these politically charged / charging cases have their "building 7".
Why does that shock you?
"it's on the interwebs, therefor it must be true".
Here's a website saying that Belgium doesn't actually exist and that it is a wasteland and that Belgians are really all being held captive in matrix styled pods beneath DisneyLand Paris!
Belgium Doesn't Exist!
While I detest this guy for killing and injuring all those people, I detest the US sentencing laws more. All those mandatory minimums and sentences that span several centuries (plus life) are ridiculous, senseless and inhumane.
This isn't some monster that killed dozens of people, that raped or tortured its way through several states. He did a horrible thing and deserves to be punished for it, but this is nothing but vindictive. People can change, they can be rehabilitated and become members of society.
Why would you think I condone any of this?You say this and yet your own country allowed people with very questionable pasts to lead the brand new Bundeswehr especially the new Luftwaffe in the 1950s and 1960s.
Recently the German Government has been charging low ranking clerks and janitors, people that weren’t even looked at for 50+ years, are now being tried for being an accomplice to genocide.
You said something about being vindictive?
Why would you think I condone any of this?
Well, apparently they didn't. I guess it wasn't part of their evidence.So you don't think his defence team would have explored this?
Well i meant it in general, regarding many politically charged / charging cases.What EXACT evidence do you believe was not dealt with in the courts?
No, it just seems unlikely.Are you implying a "seems unlikely" label as a reasonable excuse for defence in a court case?
Hes not going to cut it down to something less than several lifetimes, I bet.I don’t think you do, you want all humans dead for the good of the planet, but you’re county does, just like my country does. BTW, it was the jury that reached that decision, the judge has not signed off on it yet.
Well, apparently they didn't. I guess it wasn't part of their evidence.
Or maybe it was 'decided' from higher up.
Maybe they could tack on 9 years for every crime that someone comitted and then didnt wait around for the police to arrest them.The leaving the scene of an accident charge seems to contradict the other charges, but I guess it doesn't matter now.
The leaving the scene of an accident charge seems to contradict the other charges, but I guess it doesn't matter now.
While I detest this guy for killing and injuring all those people, I detest the US sentencing laws more. All those mandatory minimums and sentences that span several centuries (plus life) are ridiculous, senseless and inhumane.
This isn't some monster that killed dozens of people, that raped or tortured its way through several states. He did a horrible thing and deserves to be punished for it, but this is nothing but vindictive. People can change, they can be rehabilitated and become members of society.
That's good, but how about also a separate crime for failing to alert the police that you were going to commit a crime before you commit it? Then we could have three crimes for every one crime.Maybe they could tack on 9 years for every crime that someone comitted and then didnt wait around for the police to arrest them.
You know, a "making cops work for their money" flat.
By definition, first degree murder, and malicious wounding, cannot be "accidents".The spirit of that law is that he preformed a hit and run, which he did.
Sounds great. And I think there is something like a mandatory minimum of life without parole for the third crime?That's good, but how about also a separate crime for failing to alert the police that you were going to commit a crime before you commit it? Then we could have three crimes for every one crime.
Good, It looks like this evil person got what he deserved."A jury in Charlottesville said Tuesday that James Alex Fields Jr. should be sentenced to life plus 419 years in prison and $480,000 in fines, for killing Heather Heyer and seriously injuring 35 others.
Judge Richard Moore will decide whether to sign off on the recommended sentence at a hearing on March 29..."
The judge could reduce the sentence, but can't increase it. I suspect he'll follow the jury's recommendation. Fields could still be tried in federal court for federal hate crimes. Which could carry a death sentence. But I don't think that's necessary. The state jury sent a pretty clear message.
Charlottesville Jury Recommends 419 Years Plus Life For Neo-Nazi Who Killed Protester
By definition, first degree murder, and malicious wounding, cannot be "accidents".
No. The word "accident" has an actual definition, and I'm sure the law was not intended to try and make murderers remain at the scene of their murder.Sure, but that would be the letter rather than the spirit of that particular law.
Yes, because that would be almost as absurd as making schools "gun free zones" in order to prevent gun murders. Oh wait...they actually did that.They probably didn't bother to codify a separate law for fleeing the scene of a vehicular murder.
No. The word "accident" has an actual definition, and I'm sure the law was not intended to try and make murderers remain at the scene of their murder.
Yes, because that would be almost as absurd as making schools "gun free zones" in order to prevent gun murders. Oh wait...they actually did that.
Here's a cite to the Virginia law about leaving the scene of an accident. You need to provide me with the cite showing it's illegal to leave the scene of a murder. Or a rape. Or an arson. Or a jaywalking. Or any other intentional act.Leaving the scene when you've hit someone with a vehicle is illegal weather you meant to hit that person or not.
Generally when people hit and run it is because they intend to evade consequences.
The idea that it would be legal to leave the scene after a murder with a vehicle and not legal to leave after an accident is ludicrous.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?