Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Consciousness - Wikipedia
" Despite millennia of analyses, definitions, explanations and debates by philosophers
and scientists, consciousness remains puzzling and controversial,
[2] being "at once the most familiar and [also the] most mysterious aspect of our lives".
[3] Perhaps the only widely agreed notion about the topic is the intuition that consciousness exists.
So the theory of evolution is not even a theory, but a hypothesis. ok
The only things that have exhibited consciousness are things with brains.
The earliest roots in the history of science can be traced to Ancient Egypt
and Mesopotamia in around 3000 to 1200 BCE.[3][4
When man, in the name of science, denies—or by indifference,
ignores—his Maker, he blinds his mind to what he is, why he is,
where he is going, and what is the way. (Matthew 11:25)
No, not at all. The theory of evolution is most definitely a theory, hence why it is called the THEORY of evolution.
So the theory of evolutions first step, how the first life form started, is an hypothesis.
There is nothing in that verse that implies that Jesus
is addressing the proto-science investigators.
The "bible quote" you included has only the slimmest
resemblance to what you alleged the quote was:
What's this then?Science didn't exist when "Matthew" wrote his gospel,
Ya -- because they like it more than others.Theories are called theories in science for a reason, and a lot more people on this website need to learn that fact.
What's this then?
Daniel 1:4a Children in whom was no blemish, but well favoured, and skilful in all wisdom, and cunning in knowledge, and understanding science,
Ya -- because they like it more than others.
After all, you can't give a Nobel prize to every Larry, Curly, and Moe that comes up with a hypothesis; so one has to stand out above all the others, doesn't it?
What's this then?
Daniel 1:4a Children in whom was no blemish, but well favoured, and skilful in all wisdom, and cunning in knowledge, and understanding science,
Semper-Fi said: ↑
When man, in the name of science, denies—or by indifference,
ignores—his Maker, he blinds his mind to what he is, why he is,
where he is going, and what is the way. (Matthew 11:25)
The point of that end paragraph was that humans have blinded there
eyes from believing that there could be a God, and has a purpose for us.
That Consciousness could be "the spirit in man", given to us by God,
imparted in the womb. Ecclesiastes 11:5
I was giving thanks that He has reveled things to me in His Word.
The bible says He reveals things unto babes, or children like, with
open minds, without any preconceived notions, a learnable blank slate.
-
Besides "The Spirit in Man", God can also give His "Holy Spirit" Luke 11:13
"But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God:
for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them,
because they are spiritually discerned. 1 Corinthians 2:14
"God is a Spirit: and they that worship him
must worship him in spirit and in truth."
Hear are a couple verses you would be looking for 2 TIMOTHY 3:1-7
That "old translation" calls Itself "quick."It's you misusing an old translation ...
That "old translation" calls Itself "quick."
Hebrews 4:12 For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.
Do you even know what that means?
And, if perchance you should happen to ... do you know what that passage is saying?
But you're interested enough to call It an "old translation," aren't you?Never had ***ANY*** interest in bible study and this isn't the place.
But you're interested enough to call It an "old translation," aren't you?
In other words, all you see is "1611," and your academic discipline shuts everything else off, doesn't it?
Some people just like to look at the pictures, don't they?
And if you are talking about Bible scholarship rather than Bible "study" it has no place at all.Never had ***ANY*** interest in bible study and this isn't the place.
Your book means *NOTHING* to me.
What do you think "quick" means?What do you think the 1611 means?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?