Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
for what the law was not able to do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God, His own Son having sent in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, did condemn the sin in the fleshI have not seen this false teaching before , not that I remember ?
There is no condemnation for those who love God, who are called according to His Purpose, who are echad, one, abiding in Christ Jesus.
Actually the commands were given NOT to follow, but to condemn us all, causing us to have to look to grace, that is what Paul says in Romans. My paraphrase of course.
When one claims God has control over everything, that includes the darkness of sin. This is why Calviniism, when logically concluded, is in great error.
Various English translations of that verse (Isaiah 45:7) use the term ‘calamity’ or ‘disaster’ instead of ‘evil’.I think you need to take this up with God, not me: SEE this verse.... I am the LORD, and there is none else. [7] I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.
I don't know what you're getting at, but no one is arguing against the fact that there are many things that we have no choice over.When Adam was created did, he get to choose via his mighty free will? Nope
The Ninevites killed many of Jonah's countrymen, and understandably Jonah decided to flee from his assignment (Jonah 4:1-3). God chose to use extreme measures to coerce Jonah to go to Nineveh. I don't see any problem there.When Jonah Said No, I'm not going to Ninevah, God said, OK sorry I bothered you, I mean I can't coherse you, and make you go, I'll just drop the whole thing, then God walks away sulking, sad He couldn't accomplish His will.
Paul is talking about God shifting His covenant over to the Gentiles “who did not pursue righteousness but attained righteousness thru faith”.The scriptures are full of verses that do not make free will, the king / big dog on the block, but instead talk about Gods Sovereignty. Let me just give one example, Paul says the following in
Romans CH 9
"16 So then it is not of him who wills, nor of him who runs, but of God who shows mercy. 17 For the Scripture says to the Pharaoh, “For this very purpose I have raised you up, that I may show My power in you, and that My name may be declared in all the earth.” 18 Therefore He has mercy on whom He wills, and whom He wills He hardens.
19 You will say to me then, “Why does He still find fault? For who has resisted His will?” 20 But indeed, O man, who are you to reply against God? Will the thing formed say to him who formed it, “Why have you made me like this?” 21 Does not the potter have power over the clay, from the same lump to make one vessel for honor and another for dishonor?"
God did declare the end from the beginning when He wrote the book of life containing the names of everyone who would be saved. That doesn’t mean that we don’t have free will. Luke 13:6-9 is a great example of free will as well as Romans 2:4-5 and 2 Timothy 2:12.Free will is abouslutely not a thing. God is in complete control.
Isa 46:10 Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure:
I agree I would advise to stay away from bibles that contain commentary especially for people who are just learning. The word of God is sufficient.First , it has been universally understood that the Message Bible is a borderline dangerous translation so you may consider setting it aside.
As far as Romans 9, one must read in full context what Paul is saying. God had a purpose and He clearly states it in Exodus 33..
"For this very purpose I have raised you up, that I may show My power in you, and that My name may be declared in all the earth.”
This is not to be twisted into thinking that we are blameless for our sin. This is not our Father nor His Gospel of His Kingdom. This is a corruption invented by false teachers.
Additionally, the Trinity is difficult for many to understand however to say
"Has God ever been flesh? Nope!" is not the Christian world view. Jesus Christ of Nazareth is God in the flesh. We can not deny what was foretold by the Prophet Isaiah ....
For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.
Blessings
They are One God with 3 distinct personalities. I’m not seeing the third personality in your explanation of the Trinity. In this explanation I only see two personalities. The Holy Spirit is a third personality of the Trinity.You might have missed this part:
The scriptures also declare God and Jesus are "ONE"... How so?
Has God ever been flesh? Nope!
Has Jesus ever been totally flesh, absent of Spirit? Nope!
So they are one in Spirit, that is their common denominator.
So we have God, who is Spirit, Jesus who was born in the flesh, via a virgin, without sin, full of Gods Spirit, without measure, they are 2 and yet in Spirit they are one.
Did God cause Aaron to make the golden calf? Did God cause Cain to kill Able? Did God cause Ananias and Saphira to lie to the Holy Spirit then kill them for doing so? You need to think more about what “all things” encompasses.I think you need to take this up with God, not me: SEE this verse.... I am the LORD, and there is none else. [7] I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.
John Calvin is probably one of the very worst theologians who ever lived. I wish I could’ve been there to set him straight because he was so far off it’s ridiculous. He’s a 16th century theologian, why on earth would anyone hold his theology in such high regard? His teachings were refuted 1300 years before he was even born by Iranaeus. If you want to know what the apostles taught and how they intended the New Testament to be interpreted I would take the advice of a 2nd century theologian who was actually taught by a follower of the apostles over a 16th century theologian any day.That is very true. I'm not even so sure Calvin was in error. Says who?
I mean IF Calvin stated, what the scriptures plainly say, would Calvin be in error, just because you say so, or your church says so, or your denomination says so, or because your doctrines say so ?
Strange how the universal church in the book of Acts had no doctrines other than Christ, and what the 12 spoke to them, and in some cases the 12 weren't even needed as God was speaking to the individual members of the body.
Also don't forget the Bible (Which I love) is a new phenomenon.
It wasn't until the 1400's that we had the printing press. So did God's word fail all those believers in the dark ages, before the 1400's, did God leave them as if they were orphans?
Possibly "OUR" current definition of "THE WORD" is wrong. Just something to ponder.
God did declare the end from the beginning when He wrote the book of life containing the names of everyone who would be saved. That doesn’t mean that we don’t have free will. Luke 13:6-9 is a great example of free will as well as Romans 2:4-5 and 2 Timothy 2:12.
”And He began telling this parable: “A man had a fig tree which had been planted in his vineyard; and he came looking for fruit on it and did not find any. And he said to the vineyard-keeper, ‘Behold, for three years I have come looking for fruit on this fig tree without finding any. Cut it down! Why does it even use up the ground?’ And he answered and said to him, ‘Let it alone, sir, for this year too, until I dig around it and put in fertilizer; and if it bears fruit next year, fine; but if not, cut it down.’ ”“
Luke 13:6-9 NASB1995
Notice that despite Jesus’ efforts to save the tree the outcome is still uncertain because the tree itself has to decide to either cooperate or not.
”Or do you think lightly of the riches of His kindness and tolerance and patience, not knowing that the kindness of God leads you to repentance? But because of your stubbornness and unrepentant heart you are storing up wrath for yourself in the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God,“
Romans 2:4-5 NASB1995
Notice that despite God leading them to repentance they still refuse and are storing up God’s wrath upon themselves.
”It is a trustworthy statement: For if we died with Him, we will also live with Him; If we endure, we will also reign with Him; If we deny Him, He also will deny us; If we are faithless, He remains faithful, for He cannot deny Himself.“
2 Timothy 2:11-13 NASB1995
Notice that even tho Paul and Timothy are believers and followers of Christ they are still capable of denying Him which will result in Christ denying them.
God hardened Pharaoh’s heart to make an example of him because Pharaoh was a wicked man. I never said that God does not use people as His instruments from time to time.Isa 10:5 O Assyrian, the rod of mine anger, and the staff in their hand is mine indignation.
Isa 10:6 I will send him against an hypocritical nation, and against the people of my wrath will I give him a charge, to take the spoil, and to take the prey, and to tread them down like the mire of the streets.
How exactly is God sending the Assyrians against Israel, in this verse? Did he ask them to go against Israel as punishment?
The Assyrians don't worship the God of the Jews, how exactly is he making that happen? Free will is nothing more than Christian heresay, and is not supported anywhere in scripture.
How exactly does the following rhetorical question support the idea of free will?
Isa 10:15 Shall the axe boast itself against him that heweth therewith? or shall the saw magnify itself against him that shaketh it? as if the rod should shake itself against them that lift it up, or as if the staff should lift up itself, as if it were no wood.
There is nothing there that supports free will either.
Isa 63:17 O LORD, why hast thou made us to err from thy ways, and hardened our heart from thy fear? Return for thy servants' sake, the tribes of thine inheritance.
What about that verse... does that support the idea of free will?
....The answer is no it doesn't, and you have to do some pretty spectacular mental gymnastics to gel with the idea of man having a will that free.
God hardened Pharaoh’s heart to make an example of him because Pharaoh was a wicked man. I never said that God does not use people as His instruments from time to time.
So what about the verses I quoted? Can you please explain how these are not examples of free will?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?