Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Oh, I am shaking in my boots because I do not have your approval. But just to get things in perspective I demonstrated a knowledge of "punctuated equilibrium" & "phyletic gradualism".
He was saying that you misstated what neodarwinism is.<staff edit>
I am not disapproving you, I am saying (and you keep proving) that you know nothing about evolution. You said (want a quote?) that "Neo Darwinism represents gradualism" which can only be put into a sentence by someone that knows nothing about evolution.
[serious];59423791 said:I wouldn't say "knows nothing of evolution" as much as "knows nothing about the history of evolutionary theory."
I knew a fair bit about how evolution worked before I learned any substantial amount about the shifts in thought since darwin that took us to where we are now.
I'm not disagreeing that he knows nothing about evolution. I'm disagreeing with this line:I would agree with you if this was the only mistake he made, but check some of his posts elsewhereHe demonstrated a complete lack of knowledge in the subject.
I am not disapproving you, I am saying (and you keep proving) that you know nothing about evolution. You said (want a quote?) that "Neo Darwinism represents gradualism" which can only be put into a sentence by someone that knows nothing about evolution.
I see you are back on the numerology kick, which means you will purposely include made-up items tor leave out very real items in order to hit those magic numbers of 7 or 12.
It will probably be no surprise to you when I point out that you left out neo-creationism, and omphalos hypothesis, among others.
Oh, we're counting only creationism that is specifically Christian?
Take ID off your list then.
You bias attemptss to discredit the simplest and clearest statements are getting ridiculous...
Intelligent design (ID) is the proposition that "certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection."[1][2] It is a form of creationism and a contemporary adaptation of the traditional teleological argument for the existence of God, presented by its advocates as "an evidence-based scientific theory about life's origins" rather than "a religious-based idea". The leading proponents of intelligent design are associated with the Discovery Institute, a politically conservative think tank,[n 1][3] and believe the designer to be the Christian God.[n 2]
Intelligent design - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sorry, Cupid. Christians don't have a monopoly on intelligent design. The Discovery Institute is a proponent, but guess what? The whole of the Baha'i faith embrace it, which is a much larger slice of the pie than a think tank.
ID stems out of middle eastern, non Christian sentement and Christians have come to the idea quite late after its introduction. Muslims, Jews, Buddhists, Sikhs all represents proponents of ID.
Everytime I point out a flaw in one of your claims, you make some sort of arbitrary rule that superficially makes your claim appear true. That is, until I point out that if the arbitrary rule is applied consistently, then your claim is still flawed.
You are now engaged in special pleading. If neo-creationism doesn't make the list, then neither can ID.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?