Lets face it...

[Inkfingers]

The atheists are right.

 

[Ada Lovelace]

About what? The nonexistence of God and all other deities? Everything? You need to clarify. Look, my best friend already thinks he knows absolutely everything about everything in the history of ever (such happy-hubris is endearing up to a certain point, then..... not so much!) so if you're confirming that then.....

But I'm guessing you're merely being satirical? M'k. Why?

 

[agua]

The atheists are right.

I'm waiting for the punchline.

 

[quatona]

April 1st.

 

[agua]

April 1st.

you get the cupie doll.

 

[Davian]

 

[GrowingSmaller]

This is not funny.

 

[Inkfingers]

April 1st.

 

[Davian]

This is not funny.

Sure it is. And funnier yet when the atheists are still right tomorrow.

 

[Ada Lovelace]

Ooooh. Ha. I hadn't realized it was already today when the thread was created (I'm on the Pacific Coast and that was written just after midnight my time, but I hadn't realized it was that late).

 

[Inkfingers]

Ooooh. Ha. I hadn't realized it was already today when the thread was created.

 

[Ada Lovelace]

Yeahhhhh. I'm a natural born blonde so I get to have my "blonde moments," hahaha.

 

[agua]

Sure it is. And funnier yet when the atheists are still right tomorrow.

From the Christian perspective when Jesus returns we will not be laughing.

 

[GrowingSmaller]

Closed.

 

[Davian]

From the Christian perspective when Jesus returns we will not be laughing.

A little overdue, is he not?

 

[agua]

A little overdue, is he not?

No; not at all that would be pretentious; according to Peter.

2Pe 3:9 KJV The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.


( we will see Davbian how moderators presume atheist's apologetics; eh )

 

[Davian]

No; not at all that would be pretentious; according to Peter.

2Pe 3:9 KJV The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.


( we will see Davbian how moderators presume atheist's apologetics; eh )

Again, atheism makes no claims to defend, negating any requirements for apologetics.

There is a limit to the number of straw-men that can be burnt in these forums each month, and you have reached your quota.

 

[agua]

Again, atheism makes no claims to defend, negating any requirements for apologetics.

There is a limit to the number of straw-men that can be burnt in these forums each month, and you have reached your quota.

I'm wondering how in a closed thread we can continue to post. In saying that Davian you have not only failed in hiding the evidence of the man of straw but will be ill advised in striking the match.

The brand of atheism you present is definitely apologetic, of course.

 

[Davian]

I'm wondering how in a closed thread we can continue to post. In saying that Davian you have not only failed in hiding the evidence of the man of straw but will be ill advised in striking the match.

The brand of atheism you present is definitely apologetic, of course.

In reference to what claim?

 

[agua]

In reference to what claim?

What claim are you referencing ?