Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Oh come on IBS this is a; key tenet, a fundamental of the roman belief system, one of the areas all the others in essence hinge on and your going to shrug it off? They make a claim and there is no evidence, let us get real and brush off these traditions and look up to the cross.Faith is the evidence of things not seen. *shrug*
I can furthermore provide proof of what people said, to show the contrary to what the Vatican stated. And I will not intentionally leave anything out, like so many quote miners do.
I have asked you guys to prove the Papacy over the whole church from 50 ad to 200 ad AND there is NOTHING.
It's not about me boswd, read the OP.So are you saying there never was a Bishop of Rome and are you also saying that before the East West Schism the Bishop of Rome was not declared First Among Equals and had Primacy?
let's not forgot oh Mighty word game player, that the term or word Pope was nothing more than a term of endearment, a nickname if you will. Bishop of Rome is the official title.
You always claim you are such an astute Christian Historian who lays claims that you know Christian history inside and out upside and down. And now you make claims there was never a Bishop of Rome who the others considered first among equals?
Of course, we know how much he and Clement, who are both taught directly by the apostles, exhort followers of Christ to be subject to the bishops. If you don't know... read it!Chapter III.—Avoid schismatics. Keep yourselves from those evil plants which Jesus Christ does not tend, because they are not the planting of the Father. Not that I have found any division among you, but exceeding purity. For as many as are of God and of Jesus Christ are also with the bishop. And as many as shall, in the exercise of repentance, return into the unity of the Church, these, too, shall belong to God, that they may live according to Jesus Christ. Do not err, my brethren. If any man follows him that makes a schism in the Church, he shall not inherit the kingdom of God. If any one walks according to a strange (i.e., heretical) opinion, he agrees not with the passion [of Christ.].
Epistle to the Philadelphians, Cap. 7: For when I was among you, I cried, I spoke with a loud voice—the word is not mine, but God’s—Give heed to the bishop, and to the presbytery and deacons. But if ye suspect that I spake thus, as having learned beforehand the division caused by some among you, He is my witness, for whose sake I am in bonds, that I learned nothing of it from the mouth of any man. But the Spirit made an announcement to me, saying as follows: Do nothing without the bishop; keep your bodies as the temples of God; love unity; avoid divisions; be ye followers of Paul, and of the rest of the apostles, even as they also were of Christ.
They are contradictory. There are no extant records of the account. The first five or so "bishop" listings are contradictory. There's only vain pretending as Firmilian said. But don't feel bad, no one can produce their rolls of bishops, except for the apostles to Polycarp; there's no questions or contradictions there.
You mean of the resurrection? Or the bishops?
We don't really believe men's traditions because they say so though right?Faith is the evidence of things not seen. *shrug*
We don't really believe men's traditions because they say so though right?
Church member: " Why should I believe such and such"
Pastor: "Because it's what we've always taught"
So are you saying there never was a Bishop of Rome and are you also saying that before the East West Schism the Bishop of Rome was not declared First Among Equals and had Primacy?
let's not forgot oh Mighty word game player, that the term or word Pope was nothing more than a term of endearment, a nickname if you will. Bishop of Rome is the official title.
You always claim you are such an astute Christian Historian who lays claims that you know Christian history inside and out upside and down. And now you make claims there was never a Bishop of Rome who the others considered first among equals?
I've read it...Just doing some various study on Ignatius:
Of course, we know how much he and Clement, who are both taught directly by the apostles, exhort followers of Christ to be subject to the bishops. If you don't know... read it!
Ignatius condemns heretics outright.
I've read it...
Not sure what Iggys stuff has to do with anything?
Clement to the corinthians said himself who Corinth should submit to AND IT WAS NOT HIM.
Clement a great man of Gods epistle bleeds band of brother leadership not monarchical...
I've read it...
Not sure what Iggys stuff has to do with anything?
Dude, EO agree with the OP. It's not as if Simon is making up something. He's asking for evidence of the claim by RC. It was known ... Well provide the evidence for that knowing. It should be easy. It was known, well show us.
Actually, if anything, the evidence shows that Rome was first 'ruled' by a 'college' of 'bishops', not by the later development of a singular Pope.
Your ability to NOT understand a simple point perplexes me.I did you and your claims that the Bishop of Rome never existed and never had Primacy among Bishops.
You claim you know soo much of Christian History, so it's awfully interesting for you to be ignorant of this fact.
I"m assuming you also do not think Peter was First Among Equals as well.
No sir friend, i just didn't want to miss something you may have thought was relevant...Sorry if it sounded short.I just said, a 'variant study'... I was deviating a bit, and just posting what I came across as I found it interesting, while studying to maybe find some information regarding. There's no problem, is there?
Nope.did not the early church regard the Bishop of Rome First Among Equals?
No sir friend, i just didn't want to miss something you may have thought was relevant...Sorry if it sounded short.
Dude the EO will even say if East and West got back together the Bishop of Rome would still have Primacy.
This is when I miss Anglian, he knew how to put you quote miners and fact twisters into place and he is an OO, and had no horse in this race. LOL
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?