• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Known for all ages?? NOT

plmarquette

Veteran
Oct 5, 2004
3,254
192
74
Auburn , IL.
✟4,379.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Politics
US-Republican
then what was meant by Aaron and his seed in the mosaic temple...old testament

what is wrong with Peter and his successors...is it not the similar thought...

or Moses and the rulers of the congregation and the catholic magisterium...

now you have a "precident"...
 
Upvote 0

simonthezealot

have you not read,what God has spoken unto you?
Apr 17, 2006
16,461
1,919
Minnesota
✟35,153.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Faith is the evidence of things not seen. *shrug*
Oh come on IBS this is a; key tenet, a fundamental of the roman belief system, one of the areas all the others in essence hinge on and your going to shrug it off? They make a claim and there is no evidence, let us get real and brush off these traditions and look up to the cross.
 
Upvote 0

simonthezealot

have you not read,what God has spoken unto you?
Apr 17, 2006
16,461
1,919
Minnesota
✟35,153.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I can furthermore provide proof of what people said, to show the contrary to what the Vatican stated. And I will not intentionally leave anything out, like so many quote miners do.
I have asked you guys to prove the Papacy over the whole church from 50 ad to 200 ad AND there is NOTHING.
 
Upvote 0

boswd

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2008
3,801
568
✟6,566.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married

So are you saying there never was a Bishop of Rome and are you also saying that before the East West Schism the Bishop of Rome was not declared First Among Equals and had Primacy?

let's not forgot oh Mighty word game player, that the term or word Pope was nothing more than a term of endearment, a nickname if you will. Bishop of Rome is the official title.

You always claim you are such an astute Christian Historian who lays claims that you know Christian history inside and out upside and down. And now you make claims there was never a Bishop of Rome who the others considered first among equals?
 
Upvote 0

simonthezealot

have you not read,what God has spoken unto you?
Apr 17, 2006
16,461
1,919
Minnesota
✟35,153.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
It's not about me boswd, read the OP.
 
Upvote 0

ivebeenshown

Expert invisible poster and thread killer
Apr 27, 2010
7,073
623
✟32,740.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Just doing some various study on Ignatius:

Of course, we know how much he and Clement, who are both taught directly by the apostles, exhort followers of Christ to be subject to the bishops. If you don't know... read it!

Ignatius condemns heretics outright.

One group believes dietary laws of Moses are in effect, while one does not? One of these is heretical.
One group believes you can separate the human and the divine natures of Christ, while one does not? One of these is heretical.
One group believes the human and divine natures of Christ are melded as one nature, while one does not? One of these is heretical.
One group believes the bread and wine are not the body and blood of Christ, while one does? One of these is heretical.

Elsewhere:

 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Standing Up

On and on
Sep 3, 2008
25,360
2,757
Around about
✟73,735.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private

You mean of the resurrection? Or the bishops?

Not you too ...
 
Upvote 0

sunlover1

Beloved, Let us love one another
Nov 10, 2006
26,146
5,348
Under the Shadow of the Almighty
✟102,311.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Faith is the evidence of things not seen. *shrug*
We don't really believe men's traditions because they say so though right?

Church member: " Why should I believe such and such"

Pastor: "Because it's what we've always taught"
 
Upvote 0

boswd

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2008
3,801
568
✟6,566.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
We don't really believe men's traditions because they say so though right?

Church member: " Why should I believe such and such"

Pastor: "Because it's what we've always taught"


church member : "how do I know God is real, I can't see him

Pastor: "Because you have to have Faith"
 
Upvote 0

Standing Up

On and on
Sep 3, 2008
25,360
2,757
Around about
✟73,735.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private

Dude, EO agree with the OP. It's not as if Simon is making up something. He's asking for evidence of the claim by RC. It was known ... Well provide the evidence for that knowing. It should be easy. It was known, well show us.

Actually, if anything, the evidence shows that Rome was first 'ruled' by a 'college' of 'bishops', not by the later development of a singular Pope.
 
Upvote 0

simonthezealot

have you not read,what God has spoken unto you?
Apr 17, 2006
16,461
1,919
Minnesota
✟35,153.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I've read it...
Not sure what Iggys stuff has to do with anything?
Clement to the corinthians said himself who Corinth should submit to AND IT WAS NOT HIM.

Clement a great man of Gods epistle bleeds band of brother leadership not monarchical...
 
Upvote 0

boswd

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2008
3,801
568
✟6,566.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
I've read it...
Not sure what Iggys stuff has to do with anything?
Clement to the corinthians said himself who Corinth should submit to AND IT WAS NOT HIM.

Clement a great man of Gods epistle bleeds band of brother leadership not monarchical...

But was Clement the Bishop of Rome and did not the early church regard the Bishop of Rome First Among Equals?
 
Upvote 0

ivebeenshown

Expert invisible poster and thread killer
Apr 27, 2010
7,073
623
✟32,740.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
I've read it...
Not sure what Iggys stuff has to do with anything?

I just said, a 'variant study'... I was deviating a bit, and just posting what I came across as I found it interesting, while studying to maybe find some information regarding. There's no problem, is there?
 
Upvote 0

boswd

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2008
3,801
568
✟6,566.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married


Dude the EO will even say if East and West got back together the Bishop of Rome would still have Primacy.

This is when I miss Anglian, he knew how to put you quote miners and fact twisters into place and he is an OO, and had no horse in this race. LOL
 
Upvote 0

simonthezealot

have you not read,what God has spoken unto you?
Apr 17, 2006
16,461
1,919
Minnesota
✟35,153.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Your ability to NOT understand a simple point perplexes me.
My view or any protestants view on Peter's position is irrelevant...
Back to the discussion. As you well know, what I am asking for is not at all unreasonable. This goes back 1700 years as Rome began to assert itself in a way that other Bishops did not agree with. Don't try to frame this as some kind of radical statement. What I am asking for is at the core of the Orthodox/Catholic split, is it not? At the core of this debate, is my request that Catholicism prove its claim of Papal supremacy. Everyone knows this is the primary issue that caused a massive split 1000 years ago. This is not a Simon invention. Reasonable people disagreed then and now. Do you think the Orthodox church is absurd as well for not believing this? I keep mentioning the Orthodox because most scholars in this particular area of the Papacy tend to be Catholic or Orthodox.
For most Protestants, who are content with a simplistic petra/petros argument, they never investigate further.

This is not a Simon argument. It is a debate that has raged on for 1700 to 1800 years, This stance of Catholicism must be proven. It has no room for development by their own decrees:
I can show you quotes that show how the early Church viewed this. I can provide quote after quote of how they viewed this. Remember, this doctrine does not develop according to their beliefs but has always been there.

First Vatican Council
"That which the Prince of Shepherds and great Shepherd of the sheep, Jesus Christ our Lord, established in the person of the blessed Apostle Peter to secure the perpetual welfare and lasting good of the Church, must, by the same institution, necessarily remain unceasingly in the Church; which, being founded upon the Rock, will stand firm to the end of the world. For none can doubt, and it is known to all ages, that the holy and blessed Peter, the Prince and Chief of the Apostles, the pillar of the faith and foundation of the Catholic Church, received the keys of the kingdom from our Lord Jesus Christ, the Saviour and Redeemer of mankind, and lives presides and judges, to this day and always, in his successors the Bishops of the Holy See of Rome, which was founded by him and consecrated by his blood. Whence, whosoever succeeds to Peter in this See, does by the institution of Christ himself obtain the Primacy of Peter over the whole Church"
 
Upvote 0

simonthezealot

have you not read,what God has spoken unto you?
Apr 17, 2006
16,461
1,919
Minnesota
✟35,153.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I just said, a 'variant study'... I was deviating a bit, and just posting what I came across as I found it interesting, while studying to maybe find some information regarding. There's no problem, is there?
No sir friend, i just didn't want to miss something you may have thought was relevant...Sorry if it sounded short.
 
Upvote 0

ivebeenshown

Expert invisible poster and thread killer
Apr 27, 2010
7,073
623
✟32,740.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
No sir friend, i just didn't want to miss something you may have thought was relevant...Sorry if it sounded short.

No problem, I just like to post my current readings as a sort of 'reminder' to myself, like when you study a book it's best to output some of the input to make it 'stick'.

But, a question: do you deny that 'apostolic succession' was a doctrine that was held early-on? And if you do not deny this, what makes you think a random bishop is going to get away with being appointed, who the congregation has not heard of or been acquainted with?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Standing Up

On and on
Sep 3, 2008
25,360
2,757
Around about
✟73,735.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private

Funny stuff. You're arguing for your own salvific endangerment, according to Roman Catholicism. Read the OP document.
 
Upvote 0