KJO and Gail Riplinger (New Age Versions)

JM said:

Bill, I'm not KJVO ala Riplinger, but have you read the posts on PuritanBoard from Rev. Winzer and JerusalemBlade? They make a very, very strong case for the use of the TR and the AV.

Are you a member there?

Click to expand...

The Holy scripture is the only sufficient, certain, and infallible rule of all saving knowledge, faith, and obedience, although the light of nature, and the works of creation and providence do so far manifest the goodness, wisdom, and power of God, as to leave men inexcusable; yet are they not sufficient to give that knowledge of God and his will which is necessary unto salvation.

Click to expand...

Another question that comes to my mind is, "when will the canon be closed?"

If we have no problem with deleting and inserting text based on new evidence, why would we have problems with deleting and inserting books based on new evidence? Larry Bray

Click to expand...

That's it in a nutshell. If you can delete 1 John 5:7 and associated texts why can't you delete 2 John or any of the other Antilegomena? And why can't you include the Epistle of Barnabas, Shepherd of Hermas, or the First Epistle of Clement, since these are to be found in the so-called "oldest and most authentic codices," Aleph and B? Modern textual criticism is arbitrary, resting on unsound theological principles, which is why I suppose these days they call it an "art" instead of a "science." Rev. Winzer

Click to expand...