KInda an obvious consequent to your conditional.If there isn’t a legal mechanism to charge a former President, then ... there’s no legal way to charge them with crimes while they were President?
If you bring up liars, you put Trump on the table for the same reason that when you bring up scientists, you put Isaac Newton on the table.Has nothing to do with Trump.
The prosecution is precisely because he sought to illegally become president again. Reality is a harsh thing sometimes, but it is real. Try to find a way to live with it.It appears the only reason this prosecution proceeds is because a previous president seeks to legally be president again.
Because they are baloney.Sounds like something that someone should bring up in the courts. I wonder why we hear these sorts of claims here but never in places like those where there are serious legal consequences for lying.
This is a current on going investigation by the election board. A little late but the truth will come out. All of this election denier hoop-la may need to hunt another fish to fry. There absolutely was fraud in the election. The only real question is how much. It looks real bad in Georgia. Do you think if they can prosecute Trump in Georgia for challenging a fraudulent election they could maybe prosecute those that committed the fraud. We shall see. Somebody deleted those ballot images required to be kept by law. I smell a rat in Georgia. BTW Fannie's case is falling apart and so are others. Not a good time for liberals right now.Sounds like something that someone should bring up in the courts. I wonder why we hear these sorts of claims here but never in places like those where there are serious legal consequences for lying.
Reality is harsh! Where do you think those ballot images went? Potentially more than enough to have given Georgia to Trump. Looks like someone on that election board is actually doing their job.The prosecution is precisely because he sought to illegally become president again. Reality is a harsh thing sometimes, but it is real. Try to find a way to live with it.
Already has. You see, the Secretary of State made sure that all the actual ballots were retained. So it doesn't matter if anyone took pictures of them, or not.This is a current on going investigation by the election board. A little late but the truth will come out.
There was. The fake elector scheme. Some people (mostly Trump voters, would you like to see that?) voted illegally. But none of it was enough to change the results.There absolutely was fraud in the election.
They have. A number of Trump's cronies have already flipped and taken plea deals for their part in Trump's scheme. While there was election fraud such as Trump's attempt to get republicans to "find" more votes for him, the officials wouldn't cooperate in his fraud, and it failed.Do you think if they can prosecute Trump in Georgia for challenging a fraudulent election they could maybe prosecute those that committed the fraud.
A number of counties never took them. However, the Georgia Secretary of State still has the original ballots. So much for your story. Don't be so gullible.Where do you think those ballot images went?
Yep. To Trump's dismay. Try to find a way to live with the reality. It's not the only state where prosecutors are rounding up the people who committed voter fraud...Looks like someone on that election board is actually doing their job.
And yet you dug up a whole new distracting bit of unsourced nonsense and posted it to (I believe) more than one thread. I can see you flopping on the dock.Actually nothing failed you mistakenly felt you had explained it all away but you failed miserably.
It's only been in the last few weeks that I've learned where your avatar is from.Sounds like something that someone should bring up in the courts. I wonder why we hear these sorts of claims here but never in places like those where there are serious legal consequences for lying.
? Of the 4 criminal prosecution against Trump, none have indicted him for illegally running for President in the 2024 election.The prosecution is precisely because he sought to illegally become president again.
Four. A new record for a fired ex-president. Actually, a record for any ex-president. Actually, 1 would have been a record for any ex-president.? Of the 4 criminal prosecution against Trump,
none have indicted him for illegally running for President in the 2024 election.
I suspect he didn't know he was being played. It's true that some counties didn't take pictures of every ballot, but on the other hand, the actual ballots remain in the custody of the state of Georgia so it's a moot point. This is particularly true since the counties were not required at that time to make images of the ballots:And yet you dug up a whole new distracting bit of unsourced nonsense and posted it to (I believe) more than one thread. I can see you flopping on the dock.
There was no video in the post I responded to where this claim came out of nowhere. I haven't looked at any of the videos anyone has posted to it.How is video from the actual election board unsourced? You try too hard to spin.
The decision to post another off-topic and irrelevant distraction is a choice, whether you know it is false, have been conned, or just don't know about the truthiness of it.I suspect he didn't know he was being played. It's true that some counties didn't take pictures of every ballot, but on the other hand, the actual ballots remain in the custody of the state of Georgia so it's a moot point.
So, women must adhere to their husband's opinions? They are not allowed to express themselves without some man's permission?Obviously Thomas prefers "technicalities" instead of truth.
His wife's support of the insurrection should require him to recuse himself.
Ugh, of course not.They are not allowed to express themselves without some man's permission?
Do you feel the same way about Trump’s current Judge! I bet not. It is about ethics right?But if a judge's wife is involved in the subject of a case before the judge, the judge must ethically recuse him- or herself.
Is his wife employed by the accounts payable part of the Trump machine, or did Stormy Daniels also allege an affair with his wife?Do you feel the same way about Trump’s current Judge! I bet not. It is about ethics right?
Absolutely. Can you imagine the howls of outrage on the right if it were a moderate judge whose wife was actively discouraging the insurrection?Ugh, of course not.
But if a judge's wife is involved in the subject of a case before the judge, the judge must ethically recuse him- or herself.
Ginni Thomas' involvement in fake elector schemes and claims of election fraud (among other things) raises a serious concern if such a case were to come before SCOTUS.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?