• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Judge Warns Jurors to Stay Anonymous

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
42,476
20,330
Finger Lakes
✟322,013.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

“My advice to you is not to identify yourselves. Not now and not for a long time,” Kaplan said. “If you’re one who elects to speak to others and to identify yourselves to others, I direct you not to identify anyone else who sat on this jury. Each of you owes that to the other, whatever you decided for yourself.”

Kaplan had referenced the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack and Trump’s various statements taking aim at jurors and officials involved in other cases as reasons for ordering an anonymous jury.

This is highly unusual in a civil case; it is more often reserved for criminal cases involving mafia or gangs.
 

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
28,711
17,320
Here
✟1,494,488.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

“My advice to you is not to identify yourselves. Not now and not for a long time,” Kaplan said. “If you’re one who elects to speak to others and to identify yourselves to others, I direct you not to identify anyone else who sat on this jury. Each of you owes that to the other, whatever you decided for yourself.”
Kaplan had referenced the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack and Trump’s various statements taking aim at jurors and officials involved in other cases as reasons for ordering an anonymous jury.

This is highly unusual in a civil case; it is more often reserved for criminal cases involving mafia or gangs.

I would say it's sound advice.

While it is unusual for civil cases, it's not entirely unheard of.


The OJ civil trial involved withholding the identities of the jurors as well.


Some legal experts are saying that it's a concerning trend to have more and more anonymous juries in cases in general (be it Criminal or Civil cases)


On one hand, it's sad that these kinds of safety concerns exist...however, it's a reality now that there's social media and all you need is a name & city and there are plethora of tools to find people.

On the other hand, the author of this piece does make a point about how anonymous juries can have the effect of eroding confidence as it undermines, what's supposed to be, a system that has level of transparency.


Certain media outlets "looking for a scoop" certainly aren't helping with that matter either.

If we rewind to the Kyle Rittenhouse trial, there was the case of MSNBC following the juror bus.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0