Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Love them and treat them as human beings.True - so how else should we help them?
I agree and I show my love by always being honest and standing up for the truth.Love them and treat them as human beings.
Treat everyone well.
Simple.
Probably not suddenly, but it happens. Some have become famousA woman literally can’t live as a man because they’re women and don’t know what it’s like to be men. Just because they are tomboys or more masculine means they should suddenly live as men.
I was responding to this post:With all due respect, I’m scratching my head on this one.
Along with way more that are still considered to be medically appropriate. So there's really no predictive power in this observation other than the obvious - we never have 100% perfect absolute knowledge. Despite that, we still manage to muddle along regardless of regressive forces working to prevent progress based on the best understanding we do have.History is chock full of things that were determined to be "medically appropriate" that later turned out to be utter foolishness.
Despite that, we still manage to muddle along regardless of regressive forces working to prevent progress based on the best understanding we do have.
If she wants to live as a man, that's her choice, it doesn't mean she is literally a man.Probably not suddenly, but it happens. Some have become famous
I was responding to this post:
"Masculinity refers to qualities associated with men and boys.
A woman who displays more masculine qualities does not have a "masculine gender"
If a woman has masculine qualities why should she not live as a man if she wants?
In scientific fields, it's almost always made by people who have actual evidence the current understanding is wrong rather than those simply walking around spouting empty platitudes about how people are occasionally wrong.Progress is made by dissenters, almost always.
And nobody claims that it can. Attributing that claim to trans people is a lie.If she wants to live as a man, that's her choice, it doesn't mean she is literally a man.
People can do what they want, it doesn't mean their body will suddenly change based on whims.
Blessings
In scientific fields, it's almost always made by people who have actual evidence the current understanding is wrong rather than those simply walking around spouting empty platitudes about how people are occasionally wrong.
But the challenge must be based on actual scientific evidence. "The current consensus is wrong because it disagrees with the Bible" doesn't count. It's anti-science.In scientific fields, advancements are made when someone is brave enough to counter the consensus. That becomes more and more difficult when there are hordes of useful idiots tarring people as "anti-science" for daring to speak against the consensus.
But the challenge must be based on actual scientific evidence.
"The current consensus is wrong because it disagrees with the Bible" doesn't count.
It's anti-science.
I wasn’t clear. Even after going through all the procedure, the body doesn’t magically change.And nobody claims that it can. Attributing that claim to trans people is a lie.
My response is the same. Nobody expects it to. Attributing that claim to trans people is a lie.I wasn’t clear. Even after going through all the procedure, the body doesn’t magically change.
Let me reword myself, again.And nobody claims that it can. Attributing that claim to trans people is a lie.
OK. Wording it that way, everybody agrees with you. Even trans people, though they would probably phrase it a little more felicitously..Let me reword myself, again.
Even after trans surgery, a male body doesn’t become female body or vice versa. It’s still a male body, but it’s been mutilated.
It's also a lot more difficult when they sidestep the fact that evidence is a lot more convincing than empty insults towards people pointing out the lack thereof.In scientific fields, advancements are made when someone is brave enough to counter the consensus. That becomes more and more difficult when there are hordes of useful idiots tarring people as "anti-science" for daring to speak against the consensus.
It's also a lot more difficult when they sidestep the fact that evidence is a lot more convincing than empty insults towards people pointing out the lack thereof.
Post 109 introduced the phrase to the thread. Perhaps take your complaint up with the author of that post rather than addressing it to me to try and distract from the point of what I wrote.I agree. Empty insults like "anti-science" are not at all convincing nor compelling.
By confronting them about it. Is that really the most loving way of treating someone you believe to be suffering from a mental illness?I agree and I show my love by always being honest and standing up for the truth.
Post 109 introduced the phrase to the thread. Perhaps take your complaint up with the author of that post rather than addressing it to me to try and distract from the point of what I wrote.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?