Joe caught lying "I think you're in the clear"

[JacksBratt]

Joe Biden knew of his son's dealings even though he stated many times and emphatically that he knew nothing.

Joe Biden knew about Hunter's Chinese business dealings, voicemail reveals

"Hey pal, it's Dad. It's 8:15 on Wednesday night. If you get a chance, just give me a call. Nothing urgent. I just wanted to talk with you," Joe Biden said in the Dec. 12, 2018, voicemail, which was first reported by the Daily Mail.


"I thought the article released online, it's going to be printed tomorrow in the Times, was good," added Joe Biden, who wasn't serving in public office at the time. "I think you're clear. And anyway, if you get a chance, give me a call. I love you."

This was in direct reference to an article in the NY times discussing Hunters dealings with a Chinese Oil tycoon who was later arrested for economic crimes.


Voicemail shows Joe Biden knew of Hunter's China dealings: report

They tried every which way to pin stuff on 45... All the while 46 has a sharp staccato beacon of light flashing on all his corruption... and... crickets...

Well, the tide is turning.

 

[disciple Clint]

Joe Biden knew of his son's dealings even though he stated many times and emphatically that he knew nothing.

Joe Biden knew about Hunter's Chinese business dealings, voicemail reveals

"Hey pal, it's Dad. It's 8:15 on Wednesday night. If you get a chance, just give me a call. Nothing urgent. I just wanted to talk with you," Joe Biden said in the Dec. 12, 2018, voicemail, which was first reported by the Daily Mail.


"I thought the article released online, it's going to be printed tomorrow in the Times, was good," added Joe Biden, who wasn't serving in public office at the time. "I think you're clear. And anyway, if you get a chance, give me a call. I love you."

This was in direct reference to an article in the NY times discussing Hunters dealings with a Chinese Oil tycoon who was later arrested for economic crimes.


Voicemail shows Joe Biden knew of Hunter's China dealings: report

They tried every which way to pin stuff on 45... All the while 46 has a sharp staccato beacon of light flashing on all his corruption... and... crickets...

Well, the tide is turning.

My only question is just how many times must Joe get caught in lies before people recognize the fact that Joe lies frequently and sometimes for no apparent reason.

 

[JacksBratt]

My only question is just how many times must Joe get caught in lies before people recognize the fact that Joe lies frequently and sometimes for no apparent reason.

Good question.

 

[childeye 2]

My only question is just how many times must Joe get caught in lies before people recognize the fact that Joe lies frequently and sometimes for no apparent reason.

I don't see where it's shown that Joe lied. As I see it, Joe can both be informed that his son has dealings with a Chinese entity, and yet still not know anything about the deals. So that if Joe were asked if he knows about any deals his son is involved with in China, he could honestly state that he had no knowledge, or he could also honestly state that he had some knowledge, depending on how he perceived the intent of the question.

 

[Lulav]

"I thought the article released online, it's going to be printed tomorrow in the Times, was good," added Joe Biden, who wasn't serving in public office at the time. "I think you're clear.

I think that says a lot about what he knew and if his son would be seen innocent.

 

[Fantine]

Joe Biden knew of his son's dealings even though he stated many times and emphatically that he knew nothing.

Joe Biden knew about Hunter's Chinese business dealings, voicemail reveals

"Hey pal, it's Dad. It's 8:15 on Wednesday night. If you get a chance, just give me a call. Nothing urgent. I just wanted to talk with you," Joe Biden said in the Dec. 12, 2018, voicemail, which was first reported by the Daily Mail.


"I thought the article released online, it's going to be printed tomorrow in the Times, was good," added Joe Biden, who wasn't serving in public office at the time. "I think you're clear. And anyway, if you get a chance, give me a call. I love you."

This was in direct reference to an article in the NY times discussing Hunters dealings with a Chinese Oil tycoon who was later arrested for economic crimes.


Voicemail shows Joe Biden knew of Hunter's China dealings: report

They tried every which way to pin stuff on 45... All the while 46 has a sharp staccato beacon of light flashing on all his corruption... and... crickets...

Well, the tide is turning.

December, 2018, when his father was a private citizen.

 

[The Barbarian]

December, 2018, when his father was a private citizen.

And there you go again, messing up a perfectly good conspiracy theory with a nasty little fact.

 

[JacksBratt]

December, 2018, when his father was a private citizen.

Ah yes... That logic would never work to dismiss any of the accusations against DT.. but.. the Biden's.. or anyone on the left.. are Teflon, nothing sticks..
Meanwhile, the left are obsessed with DT and all the things that he didn't do.. but that they are trying to present as truth.

It matters not that this was 2018.. The connection of the Biden's to China and the Ukraine is still an issue. If it wasn't an issue.. Joe would not be lying about it and the legacy media would not be ignoring it.. and social media would not be banning people for mentioning it.

Again, if this was flipped and these same events were done by the Trump family.. they would want him jailed and never be able to be on a ballot again. But.. it was 2018 so..... it matters not?

The fear that the left has for DT is directly proportional to amount of lies they propagate against him and the truth's that they ignore about Biden.

 

[disciple Clint]

I don't see where it's shown that Joe lied. As I see it, Joe can both be informed that his son has dealings with a Chinese entity, and yet still not know anything about the deals. So that if Joe were asked if he knows about any deals his son is involved with in China, he could honestly state that he had no knowledge, or he could also honestly state that he had some knowledge, depending on how he perceived the intent of the question.

Good news this is going to be investigated next year and all the evidence will be provided proving that Joe not only knew exactly what was going on but that he was an active participant.