Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Perhaps some are keeping their eyes open for real, ... AND significant, fraud ...I have repeatedly been told where is the “ evidence of fraud “ I posted an admittedly long video of a in depth look at an actual lawsuit filed. It pointed out both strengths and weaknesses. To long to watch watch was the response. I posted a much shorter video of an actual eye witness under oath with No comment . I can only conclude very few people here really want truth most are blinded by hatred for Trump.
Do you really believe the people seeking to ignore or cover up this will do a real investigation?No fraud has been found in the investigations carried out since the election, ... that is significant enough to change the certified results.
The states are saying that their results are good (i.e. certified) ... and the Supreme Court does not do investigations. They adjudge based upon the evidence and arguments brought before them.State legislatures and the Supreme Court.
According to you, there are, at least, 50% of Americans who aren't seeking to ignore or cover possible problems with the election.Do you really believe the people seeking to ignore or cover up this will do a real investigation?
At this point, the only eyes that really matter are those of judges.How can one know that if they refuse to look at facts placed before them?
But not enough to swing the election to Trump.Maybe true. No “widespread” fraud, but fraud in a few crucial counties is a fact. The same in other swing states.
There have been investigations. None has shown widespread fraud.The attorney general has not conducted an in depth investigation. The msm’s investigation consisted of calling states and asking if there was “widespread” fraud and when they were told no fraud here they proceeded to tell the American people no fraud here. We need a real investigation for real facts.
Trump did not win, except perhaps in your little fantasy world...No one wants elections until Trump wins. He already won and when the fraud is rooted out he will be president fairly and rightly. Stayed tuned until the Supreme Court speaks and the swearing in.
Source of your definitions? I looked in several dictionaries and found none that defined stripped as "taken by illegal means."Abolished=taking by legal legislation. Stripped = taken by illegal means.
Here is post 546: "Read your quote carefully. The question was about 592 specific ballots not the entire election. Some ballots are challenged not because of fraud but for other reasons.I say he was telling the truth about those 592 specific ballots. Are you trying to imply with this quote there is no charge of fraud in any way? I sure hope not." That does not explain why Trump lawyers told judges that they had no evidence of voter fraud. That's been said by more than one lawyer in more than one court.This was debunked in post #546
But as you know, the other side is simply desperate not to allow that, intent as it is upon talking down any evidence that shows fraud and to keep saying "there is none, there is none, there is none".The attorney general has not conducted an in depth investigation. The msm’s investigation consisted of calling states and asking if there was “widespread” fraud and when they were told no fraud here they proceeded to tell the American people no fraud here. We need a real investigation for real facts.
I saw one quote from one court presented. If you have more show your proof as I have been asked to do.Here is post 546: "Read your quote carefully. The question was about 592 specific ballots not the entire election. Some ballots are challenged not because of fraud but for other reasons.I say he was telling the truth about those 592 specific ballots. Are you trying to imply with this quote there is no charge of fraud in any way? I sure hope not." That does not explain why Trump lawyers told judges that they had no evidence of voter fraud. That's been said by more than one lawyer in more than one court.
I saw one poll that said 75% of Republicans and 30% of Democrats believe there was fraud.30% of your own party disagrees with you and others on this thread. Amazing!According to you, there are, at least, 50% of Americans who aren't seeking to ignore or cover possible problems with the election.
Can't we count upon them to expose any significant issues with the vote ?
I saw one quote from one court presented. If you have more show your proof as I have been asked to do.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?