Dear FearNot7:
So nice to have you ask these questions! As previously mentioned, there are two sites that are thought to be the tomb where our Messiah was laid briefly. In my opinion, the garden tomb is more likely of the two, however the exact location is NOT important. What IS important is that despite the flogging and public execution, being placed in a tomb, wrapped in a shroud, with a huge stone to block the entrance, surrounded by a Roman guard, and other details.
Our Messiah rose on the third day, as he said he would. He was seen by hundreds before he ascended to heaven.
If the above was
NOT true, all the Romans needed to do was show the body. This NEVER happened because they couldn't do it.
Regarding the "true cross", I believe that Constantine's mother was said to have found it, and I have my doubts. There are slivers of wood in special cases called reliquaries, that are thought to be of the "true cross", and again, I have my doubts.
My opinion here:
If physical objects, like the "true cross" were preserved, they would be come objects of worship, rightly called idols.
For a biblical example, in Numbers 21:9, Moses raised a "bronze serpent" in the wilderness. Later on, in 2Kings 18:4, King Hezekiah destroyed the "bronze serpent" as it became an object of worship.
These objects and/or places don't deserve our worship, rather the Lord of Lords, King of Kings, deserves all of our worship!
I hope this helps and that you'll forgive me if I got on my soapbox for a while, I'm done and turn it over now.
Shalom,
CovenantRay
