It's official; the rule of law does not apply to corrupt politicians.

[KWCrazy]

The FBI just announced that despite violating multiple federal laws that it recommends no criminal charges against Hillary Clinton because they can't prove she intended to do things like delete 20,000 emails after they were under subpoena. This means that the politicians are no longer subject to the same laws that apply to others, including generals. The tyranny Jefferson warned about is here. Democrats who care nothing about the law will gleefully rush to the polls to elect the career criminal, and it will take another revolution to free the nation from the tyranny of the ruling oligarchy.

 

[crjmurray]

The FBI just announced that despite violating multiple federal laws that it recommends no criminal charges against Hillary Clinton because they can't prove she intended to do things like delete 20,000 emails after they were under subpoena. This means that the politicians are no longer subject to the same laws that apply to others, including generals. The tyranny Jefferson warned about is here. Democrats who care nothing about the law will gleefully rush to the polls to elect the career criminal, and it will take another revolution to free the nation from the tyranny of the ruling oligarchy.

Seems awfully informal and opinionated for a statement from the FBI. And it's red, too.

 

[Oafman]

Well, if they can't prove the allegations then they have no choice but to recommend no charges. Right?

 

[Circle Christ]

Teflon Clinton's. Is this really news? No, I mean really. Is this news? Where's the link to this reporting that should accompany the OP?

 

[Oafman]

But they did say she was "extremely careless", which is not necessarily the kind of description a presidential candidate is looking for.

 

[crjmurray]

Teflon Clinton's. Is this really news? No, I mean really. Is this news? Where's the link to this reporting that should accompany the OP?

Generally the OP does this.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/07/0...mey.html?_r=0&referer=https://www.google.com/

 

[AirPo]

The FBI just announced that despite violating multiple federal laws that it recommends no criminal charges against Hillary Clinton because they can't prove she intended to do things like delete 20,000 emails after they were under subpoena. This means that the politicians are no longer subject to the same laws that apply to others, including generals. The tyranny Jefferson warned about is here. Democrats who care nothing about the law will gleefully rush to the polls to elect the career criminal, and it will take another revolution to free the nation from the tyranny of the ruling oligarchy.

You mean that law that says innocent "until" proven guilty? How annoying is that.

 

[Circle Christ]

From the article crjmurray linked.

To warrant a criminal charge, Mr. Comey said, there had to be evidence that Mrs. Clinton intentionally sent or received classified information — something that the F.B.I. did not find. “Our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case,” he said at a news conference.

Do you suppose that classified information was what she deleted? Wasn't that an issue once when this story first broke?

What about the limited immunity that her IT guy got?

 

[JustOneWay]

The FBI just announced that despite violating multiple federal laws that it recommends no criminal charges against Hillary Clinton because they can't prove she intended to do things like delete 20,000 emails after they were under subpoena. This means that the politicians are no longer subject to the same laws that apply to others, including generals. The tyranny Jefferson warned about is here. Democrats who care nothing about the law will gleefully rush to the polls to elect the career criminal, and it will take another revolution to free the nation from the tyranny of the ruling oligarchy.

Except Hillary is not a career criminal.

 

[JustOneWay]

Do you suppose that classified information was what she deleted?

Considering she will not be indicted, I would say they were not classified information emails.

 

[Circle Christ]

How about this instead. She's a politician and attorney who has made a career defining the meaning of criminal law with her questionable as yet un-prosecuted actions and behaviors.

 

[nightflight]

 

[Circle Christ]

Considering she will not be indicted, I would say they were not classified information emails.

Saying isn't the same as knowing. And classified materials would be something a SoS would have access to.

 

[nightflight]

Has David Patreaus commented yet?

 

[JustOneWay]

Saying isn't the same as knowing. And classified materials would be something a SoS would have access to.

Sure, she did have access to classified information, however there was no proof found showing she deleted classified information.

Any thought otherwise is conspiracy.

 

[JustOneWay]

How about this instead. She's a politician and attorney who has made a career defining the meaning of criminal law with her questionable as yet un-prosecuted actions and behaviors.

More conspiracy.

 

[brinny]

The FBI just announced that despite violating multiple federal laws that it recommends no criminal charges against Hillary Clinton because they can't prove she intended to do things like delete 20,000 emails after they were under subpoena. This means that the politicians are no longer subject to the same laws that apply to others, including generals. The tyranny Jefferson warned about is here. Democrats who care nothing about the law will gleefully rush to the polls to elect the career criminal, and it will take another revolution to free the nation from the tyranny of the ruling oligarchy.

Interesting, eh?

 

[KWCrazy]

Well, if they can't prove the allegations then they have no choice but to recommend no charges. Right?

They had no problem with the violations of law, they said they couldn't prove intent.
How can you NOT prove intent when 20,000 emails are deleted AFTER they are under subpoena?

 

[brinny]

But they did say she was "extremely careless", which is not necessarily the kind of description a presidential candidate is looking for.

LOL!

Ya' think?

 

[KWCrazy]

Teflon Clinton's. Is this really news? No, I mean really. Is this news? Where's the link to this reporting that should accompany the OP?

No link. I was watching the spectacle unfold live on TV.