Almost there
Well-Known Member
- Oct 24, 2017
- 3,571
- 1,152
- 61
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I have no problem with that.So, perhaps we might be better off if everyone has access to machine guns, grenade launchers and anti-talk weaponry. After all, if we need NO gun laws,
Another way of expressing it is, Bribing the electorate with their own money.Two ways. First, any taxpayer money spent takes away from the citizens. Taking away your money takes away freedom. Second, any laws attached to it will cause people to have to jump through legal hoops that didn't exist before. And those hoops are always "One size fits all".
The government also doesn't have the money. It's a little like a family that is broke and buried under a mound of debt wanting to spend more on lawn care when they can't even afford the electric bill.
Are you suggesting that the government has violated the 2nd Amendment by banning machine guns, rocket launchers, and anti-tank weaponry?
But oddly, I feel no less safe.I hate to break it to ya, but we got em. There's a guy I know that legally owns 2, 20mm anti-tank guns, and a Ma Duce. And rounds for them. We were laughing over this whole Nov 4th thing.
I don't think it's "vast", much less, "vast, vast". In fact, I think a LOT of americans think the problem regarding health care is that the government got TOO involved. This is one reason there is a call for letting companies sell insurance across state lines. But I've been insurance free for almost four years now, saving well over $1,000 every month in premiums (I'm old) and getting health care out of pocket for very low cost.
That sounds more like a classical liberal viewpoint, i.g. our founding fathers.
Well your not going to take a 6' long 40lbs gun that kicks like a runaway Dodge Ram, on a bank heist.But oddly, I feel no less safe.
I In fact, I think a LOT of americans think the problem regarding health care is that the government got TOO involved. This is one reason there is a call for letting companies sell insurance across state lines. But I've been insurance free for almost four years now, saving well over $1,000 every month in premiums (I'm old) and getting health care out of pocket for very low cost. That sounds more like a classical liberal viewpoint, i.g. our founding fathers.
I hate to break it to ya, but we got em. There's a guy I know that legally owns 2, 20mm anti-tank guns, and a Ma Duce. And rounds for them. We were laughing over this whole Nov 4th thing.
I understand your position. I just wanted everyone to understand. Thank you for clarifying.I have no problem with that.
An analogy might be about the 7 year old whose father wanted her to be a solo pilot, and thereby assert rights for freedom of transportation and association (or something like that).
She took off and tragically crashed.
One can be in favour of deregulation and freedom, without abolishing all boundaries.
Sure. I have lots of neighbors that have guns. I have for decades, both in the urban and suburban environments in the Seattle area and here at my farm in KY. I've never felt at risk from any of those guns. Same is true for the weapons you mentioned.I understand your position. I just wanted everyone to understand. Thank you for clarifying.
Two ways. First, any taxpayer money spent takes away from the citizens. Taking away your money takes away freedom. Second, any laws attached to it will cause people to have to jump through legal hoops that didn't exist before. And those hoops are always "One size fits all".
The government also doesn't have the money. It's a little like a family that is broke and buried under a mound of debt wanting to spend more on lawn care when they can't even afford the electric bill.
So, he should be arrested. What is your point?
I have a billionaire relative. He has a Cessna Citation 10 passenger jet and a 2 passenger cub. He has let his grandchildren fly the cub. One was able to land it (when he was 8), though he was quite a bit older before he was allowed to solo. He has a hired pilot crew to fly the jet.Not allowing a 7 year old to fly a plane is a violation of her free speech. It is also a violation of her parent rights to raise her, especially if the plane were being flown over eerie own property and her flight was not affecting public air space.
I say this because there are those who would take this position.
Protecting our borders and protecting us from each other. This includes protecting the states from each other and protecting the citizens when a "perp" leaves the juridiction of your state to prevent capture.Perhaps, you should make your idea of government more clear.
What if ANYTHING do you believe government should be spending our money on?
What is kind of interesting is that the LESS dangerous the weapon is, the more likely you are to use it irresponsibly. Generally speaking, the higher the risk of a bad outcome, the greater the natural tendency to be responsible. It's just human nature. Thank God!My point is:
A. you're not gun enthusiasts, so you dont even know that full sized cannons, miniguns, .50 cals, anti-tank guns, flamethrowers, and even high caliber rifles are in some peoples collections.
B. The reason you don't know is because the responsible owners of such guns, aren't the type that shoot up churches. They're not in the news.
I support medicare only in the same way I support SS. People who use it paid into it. If I were elected president I'd do everything I could to abolish medicaid, section 8 housing and any other FedGov aid to individual citizens. The states can take care of it as they see fit.I agree with you position on selling across state lines. I would submit the vast majority of Americans support Medicaid and Medicare, and reject Republican efforts to reduce spending on Medicaid by $1T or more. Of course, everyone agrees that changes should be made, and that waste should be reduced.
Oh, well then.No need to discuss gun control in this latest shooting. Church is the best place to get shot.
What is kind of interesting is that the LESS dangerous the weapon is, the more likely you are to use it irresponsibly. Generally speaking, the higher the risk of a bad outcome, the greater the natural tendency to be responsible. It's just human nature. Thank God!
My point is:
A. you're not gun enthusiasts, so you dont even know that full sized cannons, miniguns, .50 cals, anti-tank guns, flamethrowers, and even high caliber rifles are in some peoples collections.
B. The reason you don't know is because the responsible owners of such guns, aren't the type that shoot up churches. They're not in the news.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?