Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Not the point.This is a different case, because it is illegal to bury someone without a physicians death certificate.
Ok then. That's what he was asking.A law like that must exist.
I don't understand how someone can call themselves pro-life and support execution.
Execution is still just as bad as murder and abortion to me.
This made me chuckle, I'll give you that.They should! Those who succeed in their suicide attempt should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law and subjected to the death penalty.
Remember, when a woman has an IUD fitted, she hasn't conceived yet! There is no fertilised egg there to 'kill' at that moment
Perhaps they can't prosecute because the victim's family refuses to press charges...They should! Those who succeed in their suicide attempt should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law and subjected to the death penalty.
A pregnancy test is done before an IUD is fitted.You may need to check on the facts of conception. Have you heard about ectopic pregnancies. My understanding is--correct me if I am wrong--that fertilization takes place outside the uterus.
Five things:
1. Laws have changed concerning bombings. Bombs have gotten more precise so they can cause less collateral damage.
2. Again, this is military law, not civil law. If you or I were to launch a missile at a city, whether it's a country our nations are at war with or not, we would be prosecuted for multiple counts of homicide, and probably an act of terrorism, not to mention illegally owning and operating weapons systems, etc...
3. Collateral damage has its own set of laws governing it, in which only official members of the armed forces are authorized to clear the launching of a missile or the dropping of a bomb. There are long investigations into any operation involving collateral damage, and the more extensive the damage, the more intensive the investigation.
4. Any persons harboring combatants or leaders of enemy armed forces are deemed to intend harm to armed forces members. If you are fighting in an urban area, you are governed by the military rules of engagement, which prohibit firing at non-combatants, among other things.
5. While the launching of a missile or dropping of a bomb is intentional, the purpose is not to inflict collateral damage but to take out a target, whether that target is an enemy leader, production facility, or something similar.
And, before we go into specifics, I don't believe the use of nuclear weapons was justified during WWII, nor do I believe nuclear warfare will ever be justified. Bombing entire cities of civilians to make a point in a war is no better than terrorism, imo.
We did it ourselves.
And all that answers how you know the mind of God how? None of it pointed to any validity of the bible being gods word. Just ways of viewing it.
Why do people keep answering Belk with science? The topic is personhood. It's not a matter of science. Of course a zygote is a human life. Everyone who was paying attention in elementary school knows that. That fact doesn't automatically lead to certain laws.
But a foetus isn't a human being, as has been explained.We use common sense, and common sense tells me that killing an innocent human being who is not guilty of a crime should not be executed by dismemberment or poisoning.
Because they don't have a coherent answer, and resort to nonsense and emotion to hide the fact.
Did you miss the following from this forum:
"It should be Murder?
Discussion in 'Ethics & Morality' started by SteveB28, Dec 28, 2015."
Will you apologize now for you oversight?
If science cannot answer a question dealing with science, then no one can!
If, one day, we come to a consensus that abortion is so egregious that it should be considered as 'murder', then you will have your day.
What part of "not a scientific question" didn't you understand?
Nope.The Hippocratic Oath was held in high esteem by physicians for around two thousand years until it was thrashed in 1973. It prohibited abortion.
It's not a question that deals with science...
Most people disagree with it, have always disagreed with it on this issue.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?