Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yes, and are we going to perform random tests to discover if a child has been sexually molested or sexually abused? Why do you ask impractical questions?
Yes, it is.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/abortion
Abortion
1.
Also called voluntary abortion. the removal of an embryo or fetus from the uterus in order to end a pregnancy.
2.
any of various surgical methods for terminating a pregnancy, especially during the first six months.
3.
Also called spontaneous abortion. miscarriage (def 1).
Well, I think the serial killer is a person, and a first trimester fetus isn't
That is up to God. He is the one to decide not us.Would you have any objection to sending most children to heaven? How about sending to heaven all those we don't like?
A fertilized ovum called a zygote is a human because all the information is there. Two people have joined together to create an offspring.Is a "fetus" a human being?
Is a "fetus" a human being? If it isn't, then what is it? A serial killer is guilty. How a bout a "fetus"? Should the law make a difference between someone who is guilty and another who is innocent?
Really?
I just laid out exactly what you said, and you still deny it?
1. You said this is a discussion about what the law should be.
2. I said that I was discussing what the law morally should be.
3. You said that's a topic for a different discussion.
4. So, to be clear, you said that anyone who wants to discuss the morality of changing the law shouldn't be discussing it on a forum discussing what the law should be. Regardless of whether you used the exact words, this is a clear statement that the law should not be based on moral standards.
You are the one that is lying, just like you're lying about the abortion rates going down after abortion was legalized. As the study cited in the Washington Post showed, abortion rates actually climbed rapidly in the years immediately following the Roe v. Wade case, with experts adding that there were still many illegal abortions taking place that weren't even accounted for in those numbers.
I'm not talking about what the human law is. I'm talking about what it should morally be.
The so called: "fools" are the ones that are having the baby. This is a test and God says to choose LIFE. Yet it is still a choice. WE hope that people would make the right choice and not kill their own child. Back during the time of slavery a father could sell their child into slavery if they wanted to. We would hope that they would not, but they had that choice they had that option. Today a mother can sell a daughter into prostitution. She can sell her daughters virginity. We would hope that a mother would not do that to her daughter but she has that choice. God gives us choices and He hopes that we make the right choice. I would hope that a parent would not kill their own child. Or that a child would not kill their parents. But they can if they want. God gives them that choice. He wants for them to make the right choice but still it is their choice to make.
We prosecute lesser crimes like rape, sexual abuse of children and car thefts. I my car is stolen, I can buy another. A life stolen can never be replaced. The criminal act is is final. Can't we use common sense?
Where do you get these inflated figures from.
I suggest you watch the following confessions of an ex-abortion doctor:
At what point in the development of the unborn child would you consider it to be a moral duty to protect the life of a human being?
If your son or daughter were dying of cancer, would you discourage him/her from praying to God?
Since the pregnant woman did not create the life that is within her, she has no "right" to end it (that is a false presupposition. Only God has the right to end life, since He is the Creator.
Abortion is murder.
It should be illegal.
The woman makes a moral choice when she gets an abortion. The person (they are not a Doctor, for a Doctor preserves life, not destroys it) who performs the abortion should likewise be charged with murder. Any staff that helped that woman to murder her child should be charged as an accessory to murder. Any boyfriend or husband that encouraged or coerced the woman to have the abortion is likewise an accessory. The friend who drove her to the abortuary likewise is an accomplice to murder.
They should be charged the same as anyone else who murders another person. For some it would be life in prison, for others, the death penalty.
Investigate the cause of the loss of pregnancy and if it is shown to have been an abortion, then it should be charged as murder.
How do you identify all those guilty of sexually abusing children? Should we legalize the sexual abuse of children because we cannot identity all crimes against children?
A miscarriage is not an abortion. An abortion is a willful choice to murder a child. Miscarriage is not.
For those who believe in God there are only two kinds of children: born and unborn. If you reject this premise, then perhaps you should limit yourself to visiting atheistic web sites.
Correct! The same applies to any other crime: theft, sexual abuse of children, rape, drug dealing, and so on. Are you suggesting that we legalize all immoral activity? Would the world be a better place if we were to make all immoral acts legal?:
Is a child the result of magic: one minute before delivery it is not a child, but a minute later it is one?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?