Nic Samojluk
Newbie
- Apr 27, 2013
- 1,748
- 170
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- SDA
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
And how would it be determined that a 'murder' had taken place in these circumstances?
There was no god involved in framing those 'laws'.[/QUOTE
"The fool said in his heart 'There is no God.'" How do you explain the fact that Daniel the prophet predicted the future in his book. Can you accurately predict the future centuries in advance? Do you know someone who can?
Those supposed 'laws' were dreamt up by humans and then attributed to fictitious gods to give them some justification.
I see many here who would wish to deny a woman the right to terminate a pregnancy, by declaring that it would be an act of murder.
And yet I also see those same people running away from this question:
How would such a law be enforced?
If you make it a murder offence to terminate a pregnancy, how are you going to identify the 'guilty'?
Yes, in fact the number of "back-alley" procedures will rise enormously if such a cruel and ridiculous law were to be introduced. I can well remember in my country prior to the 1970's the frequent horrific tales of unfortunate women faced with no other alternative than to risk their life and health over an abortion performed by a rank amateur. These fools would see us return to those times, presumably.
Moreover, where do they see the plight of the unlucky woman who suffers a miscarriage unfolding? Would she have to suffer doubly by facing the ignominy of a police investigation, to ensure that she hadn't 'murdered' her foetus?
You will note, of course, that there is a disproportionate number of men urging such a change.
We are discussing abortions and miscarriages. They do not involve children. Learn some basic biology please.
There will still be abortion. You will not remove it entirely by criminalising it.
She is not pregnant with a child. A child is what is produced AFTER the pregnancy.
It is only a fringe minority such as yourselves who would wish to impose your own narrow interpretations.
Are we going to start mandating random urine pregnancy tests just to spot check society?
And all those women who will have to undergo police interviews to satisfy that their miscarriage was 'genuine'?
If one were pro-life they would be against things like capital punishment,
Do you think that there is a moral difference between killing a serial killer and the killing of an innocent human being?
A miscarriage is not an abortion. An abortion is a willful choice to murder a child. Miscarriage is not.
Yeeeeees... we get that, the point is how do you tell the difference? Does EVERY single case of a pregnancy ending get investigated, or what?A miscarriage is not an abortion. An abortion is a willful choice to murder a child. Miscarriage is not.
Firstly we have to stop calling a baby an "it". Calling a child that word demoralizes all life and makes abortion more palitable for murder to take place.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?