Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Right, since it couldn't anyone else but “liberal leftists”.They are those who hate Charlie Kirk as exitbed in vandalizing his memorials. And the ones who have exhibited the most hatred for Charlie Kirk are liberal leftists.
Who else but the ones who express the most hated for Charlie Kirk is it likely to be?Right, since it couldn't anyone else but “liberal leftists”.
My guess is the plot to silence whatever message Kirk was promulgating. Those sneaky leftists wanted him dead because he told truth.What "backfired"?
The problem with that analysis is there's been thousands of posts all over the internet from those on the left, saying how glad they are that Charlie Kirk is dead because they don't like the message he was promulgating.My guess is the plot to silence whatever message Kirk was promulgating. Those sneaky leftists wanted him dead because he told truth.
About as outlandish as the suggestion that the rightists killed Kirk to boost his message.
It’s a high profile killing of a speaker with a platform in America. It either another day with a ‘y’ in it or such a rare statistical event that nothing will be done about it.
To quote Joe Haldeman “You pays your money and takes your frame of reference”.
That's completely contrary to established facts.Except for the right-winger who shot him.
How does that prove he's not a right winger? Or are you saying that ALL right wingers by definition like Trump? Sounds like a very very binary worldview there.That's completely contrary to established facts.
I like this photo the left was using to prove Robinson is a Trump supporter. When in fact it's a derogatory effigy of Trump depicting Robinson riding him like a donkey.
The problem with that statement is that it's false.The problem with that analysis is there's been thousands of posts all over the internet from those on the left, saying how glad they are that Charlie Kirk is dead because they don't like the message he was promulgating.
No, it was being used to prove he was a Trump supporter. In other words things are being made up to make him look like a republican right-winger Trump supporter et al.How does that prove he's not a right winger? Or are you saying that ALL right wingers by definition like Trump? Sounds like a very very binary worldview there.
Prove it's false.The problem with that statement is that it's false.
Thought so.Prove there's no Santa Claus.
There is far too much guessing on this subject. If someone wants to write posts implying a "backfiring" then they need to be explicit about who's plan backfired and what that plan was. All we seem to have is some terminally online person who is deep into internet "culture" of some sort.My guess is the plot to silence whatever message Kirk was promulgating. Those sneaky leftists wanted him dead because he told truth.
A lot of these terminally online people have rather incoherent "ideologies" as the clues left behind by them are a weird mixture of things. (Many of the school shooters, but not apparently in this case, the "clues" they leave behind refer to prior mass shootings of various motivations. It's a real mess.) Frankly all of thee "ideologies" and "plans" are quite outlandish. And that's true if he was trying to trigger a RW backlash, or destroy the right, or whatever. The thread seems to imply that it was careful plot by "the left" to put an end RW voices.About as outlandish as the suggestion that the rightists killed Kirk to boost his message.
This incident also has some resemblance to the "disgruntled fan" outlash (though such incidents seem to be more intimate and emotional, rather than emotionally detached sniper shootings). Kirk certainly had a celebrity aspect to him.It’s a high profile killing of a speaker with a platform in America. It either another day with a ‘y’ in it or such a rare statistical event that nothing will be done about it.
To quote Joe Haldeman “You pays your money and takes your frame of reference”.
It's not a negative though when one reads law enforcement reports of what's been found out about Robinson.Well duh, you don't go about proving negatives.
By all means, cite your sources for the claim it is a "liberal leftists".It's not a negative though when one reads law enforcement reports of what's been found out about Robinson.
It'll be interesting to see how much of that holds up after the investigation is completed. Apparently Robinson was quite active online and quite social too. So there's a lot there to supply a lot of information about him.There are no such facts.
The left wasn't using this photo, they were quoting his family and right-wing leanings.
View attachment 370114
Aside from the probably cause document, have any "law enforcement reports" been released? All I've seen are things filtered through Kash Patel and Spencer Cox, neither of whom I trust to be perfectly reliable.It's not a negative though when one reads law enforcement reports of what's been found out about Robinson.
Occam's razor. Who else besides liberal leftists is likely to be.By all means, cite your sources for the claim it is a "liberal leftists".
It's a matter of what their social media content looks like.(One wonders what an illiberal leftist looks like)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?