Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Leisure and Society
Society
History & Genealogy
Is war ever right?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Adam Russell" data-source="post: 1485451" data-attributes="member: 21861"><p>Right, the points are interesting, yet we have been blinded by what war was originally about --> death for liberation. Some people may disagree, but I must tell you I disagree with all forms of violence, except in self defense. People may see the new war, that was americas form of self defence, yet too many died in Afghanistan for that cause.</p><p></p><p>We must also think about the millions of Indians that died in America, as Anti-Flag's song stars and stripes has informed me. And another thing Hiroshima, although not a war, was fateful and nuclear weapons kill all life, not just the intended target.</p><p></p><p>Negotiations there were none, that were formal enough. Plus the problem stretched to England - particulairy with the Iraq dossier that was "sexed-up." All the UN inspectors found was capability, yet I bet most countries have capabilities too, especially america and England. </p><p></p><p>I finally would like to thank the people who actually argued for and against, and I will remember your points before I make a sinister remark.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Adam Russell, post: 1485451, member: 21861"] Right, the points are interesting, yet we have been blinded by what war was originally about --> death for liberation. Some people may disagree, but I must tell you I disagree with all forms of violence, except in self defense. People may see the new war, that was americas form of self defence, yet too many died in Afghanistan for that cause. We must also think about the millions of Indians that died in America, as Anti-Flag's song stars and stripes has informed me. And another thing Hiroshima, although not a war, was fateful and nuclear weapons kill all life, not just the intended target. Negotiations there were none, that were formal enough. Plus the problem stretched to England - particulairy with the Iraq dossier that was "sexed-up." All the UN inspectors found was capability, yet I bet most countries have capabilities too, especially america and England. I finally would like to thank the people who actually argued for and against, and I will remember your points before I make a sinister remark. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Leisure and Society
Society
History & Genealogy
Is war ever right?
Top
Bottom