• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Is there such a thing as a Christian homosexual?

Status
Not open for further replies.

kimber1

mean people suck
Feb 25, 2003
13,143
810
54
Va.
Visit site
✟45,863.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
*MOD HAT ON
i'll admit that i have not looked through this entire thread, just bits and pieces, but i'm receiving complaints about it so this is a general reminder to everyone. please check your sarcasm at the door. if you disagree with someone, please do so with dignity. thanks
*MOD HAT OFF
 
Upvote 0
C

Chapter 2

Guest
Outspoken said:
Agreed, I would like to see the logic behind this as well.


The point here is that not all who say "I'm a Christian" really are. It really comes down to what kind of faith you have. Is it a self-denying, non-selfish, pure faith that Christ requires, or is it something less? Can a homosexual be Christian? No. Can a Christian engage in homosexual activities? Yes. We all have sin problems, but the level of our faith determines how we deal with it. If you are truely a Christian who has a problem with homosexual behavior, then it should be the desire of your heart to stop sinning and follow Christ. That is what defines a Christian. "Blessed are those who mourn, for they shall be comforted" Mourn over what? Sin. The idea is that it is NOT ok to brush it off and say "well, everybody has a sin problem". That won't be good enough when we all stand before a holy God.
 
Upvote 0
C

Chapter 2

Guest
razzelflabben said:
What scriptural references do you base this on?

No where in the Bible will you find the exact phrase "there is no such thing as a Christian homosexual", but it is very clear where God stands on the subject even without the Bible. Look at the male body. Look at the female body. They were DESIGNED for eachother. That's how God made it and that's how He intended it to stay, and anything outside of God's will is sin. An unrepentant sinner is not Christian, so there are no homosexual Christians.
 
Upvote 0
Outspoken said:
"Yes it is, Outspoken. "

Nooo, I showed you clearly that the word is in the passage, thus the church grew daily. "
No you did not, you mentioned ekklasia. I am not using a translation, I am using the orginal Greek text. "Church" does not appear in the Greek text that has been designated most accurate by the UBS.

"The word "church" is not in the text."



incorrect ekklesia is found in the text and thus the conclusion that this is the church before Paul's conversion is a correct conclusion.
There is no ekklesia in the Greek text.
 
Upvote 0

Outspoken

Standing in the Gap
Nov 8, 2002
6,441
16
48
✟29,688.00
Faith
Christian
"I am not using a translation, I am using the orginal Greek text."

then you should know that in this context the approprate translation is church.

"There is no ekklesia in the Greek text."
Incorrect. the sentence reads aineo theos kai echo charis pros holos laos de kurios prostithemi ekklesia kata hemera sozo
 
Upvote 0
Outspoken said:
"I am not using a translation, I am using the orginal Greek text."



then you should know that in this context the approprate translation is church.
There is no mention of the word "church" or the Greek word ecclasia in the Greek text. So, it would be completely improper to translate it as being there when it is not.

"There is no ekklesia in the Greek text."



Incorrect. the sentence reads aineo theos kai echo charis pros holos laos de kurios prostithemi ekklesia kata hemera sozo
Not incorrect. No ekklasia. No ecclesia either. Not in the critical text, which is the text that NT scholarship stands behind as most authentic.
 
Upvote 0

Outspoken

Standing in the Gap
Nov 8, 2002
6,441
16
48
✟29,688.00
Faith
Christian
Fideist said:
And you have not supported your original assertion yet.
Sure I have, now please answer the quesiton as to this can lead to even more proof you are incorrect, or are you unwilling to test your wrong idea from another point of view? We can use my defintion if you want.
 
Upvote 0
Outspoken said:
[quote]Sure I have,



You have not shown in any way other than by assertion that Acts is historically reliable on this point or any other. Why are you so anxious to change the subject? Don’t you have any supporting evidence?

You have also not demonstrated that the term “church” is in the Greek text of Acts.
 
Upvote 0

Outspoken

Standing in the Gap
Nov 8, 2002
6,441
16
48
✟29,688.00
Faith
Christian
you have not demostrated the word "conversion" is in the text either. or any other english word for that matter.

"Why are you so anxious to change the subject?"

Because I'd like to show you're wrong in 2 different ways You don't want to give me any evidience to show the chain of events has changed in the book of Acts, so I was going about it another route. So again, do you want to use your defintion or mine?

"Don’t you have any supporting evidence?"

The book of Acts clearly supports me and the church, historically and now, says that's how it happened
 
Upvote 0
Outspoken said:
The book of Acts clearly supports me and the church, historically and now, says that's how it happened



So, that’s it? That’s your support? The book of Acts, which is part of the Bible and clearly not a history text, says that’s how it happened in the narrative. The Bible is correct because a narrative in the Bible says so. That is circular, as I have already pointed out. And the Bible is not a history text as I have already pointed out. So, all we do is go around and around. Obviously this is the best I can hope for, so, end of conversation. See ya around.
 
Upvote 0

Outspoken

Standing in the Gap
Nov 8, 2002
6,441
16
48
✟29,688.00
Faith
Christian
No, its a historical text.

So are you afraid? what is your defintion of a church? I guess you are scared or something to go down this route?
 
Upvote 0

razzelflabben

Contributor
Nov 8, 2003
25,818
2,503
64
Ohio
✟129,793.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Well, we see in scripture that not everyone who says Lord Lord will enter the kingdom, good theology so far. We also see that God will seperate the sheep from the goats, same basic idea.

So we move on, your post about self denying, non selfish pure faith also has biblical background, for we are to die to the old man (carnal man) and be reserrected into the power of the Holy Spirit. So far so good.

Here then is where either I do not understand you or, your theology is off. There is no problem with the desire of our hearts to be to be without sin, but the breakdown is two fold. One it is the HOly Spirit that convicts one of sin not man. So therefore, the Holy Spirit is the key to that sinless life. Second problem, is that we are to morn for many things including the lost and oppressed. Sin is not specified as far as I know.

If you are asserting that anyone who sins is a nonbeliever, I think we have a whole lot that we need to talk about. If you are isolating out homosexuals, then I would like to know what scripture you reference to determine that homosexuality is a sin much less one that proved a person is not a christian if they are homosexuality. Even in the scriptures put forth on this forum so far, it is the act of homosexuality that is discussed as sinful, not homosexuality itself. This is an important distinction to make for the person who is homosexual because it affirms who they are while condeming the act of homosexual behavior, something very rare in the church today.
 
Upvote 0

razzelflabben

Contributor
Nov 8, 2003
25,818
2,503
64
Ohio
✟129,793.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I keep hearing this statement unrepentant sinner. I have one definition for it what is yours? Where in scripture does it say that a person with an unrepentant sin is not a believer?
 
Upvote 0

mpshiel

Senior Veteran
Nov 22, 2003
2,069
400
54
I've been told "Sodom" so I guess that's close eno
Visit site
✟26,734.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Thank you for clarifying God's will, though how exactly you recieved it is still a bit of a mystery (I assume stone tablets will be forthcoming?). I was under the impression that it was God's will that ALL shall come unto him. Or that he describes himself as a God of mercy. Or that when we love one another is how the spirit of God is seen in us. But I will be reviewing different sites of naked bodies as you suggest. I would point out that perhaps if men were on average a bit shorter the arguement would be stronger as both would be able to stand during sex.
 
Upvote 0

PastorFreud

Lie back on the couch.
Oct 25, 2002
3,629
179
✟6,612.00
Faith
Protestant
coyoteBR said:
But, on the other hand... "Do not worry with what enters your mouth, but with what leaves it".

Just to say, PastorFreud, I enjoy reading your pondered posts and opinions, specially on this thread
Thanks.

Do you that that literally about not worrying what enters your mouth? I think that is a misquote, actually. I think Jesus was saying that it is not what goes into the body, but what comes out of the heart that defiles a person. Something about the inside and outside of the cup. That doesn't mean that the outside of the cup should be filthy or that that what goes in your mouth should be nasty, but that there is not point in having a clean outside when the inside is rotten. I don't see that as a condoning of Red Lobster's shrimp fest.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.