Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Is there Objective Morality?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="stevevw" data-source="post: 76761697" data-attributes="member: 342064"><p>Yes I understand what you mean and I agree with you to a point. But I was trying to determine where the line is for what is nature and what is taking responsibility for decision making especially applied to morality.</p><p></p><p>At what point do people take responsibility for decisions they make. If someone subjectively hates something they are going to find it easier to 'choose' not to participate in the act. Those who like something will find it harder to 'choose' to resist.</p><p></p><p>So it seems the psychological state of a person is closely tied to their ability to choose. The playing filed is rigged in favor of some and not others when applied to morality if what you say is correct. We are robots programmed to taste, feel and view things and we have no choice in the matter.</p><p></p><p>If that's the case then because choice is closely tied to our psychological state then people cannot help acting on it. Some people are programmed to be more likely to do wrong and others are programmed to do good.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="stevevw, post: 76761697, member: 342064"] Yes I understand what you mean and I agree with you to a point. But I was trying to determine where the line is for what is nature and what is taking responsibility for decision making especially applied to morality. At what point do people take responsibility for decisions they make. If someone subjectively hates something they are going to find it easier to 'choose' not to participate in the act. Those who like something will find it harder to 'choose' to resist. So it seems the psychological state of a person is closely tied to their ability to choose. The playing filed is rigged in favor of some and not others when applied to morality if what you say is correct. We are robots programmed to taste, feel and view things and we have no choice in the matter. If that's the case then because choice is closely tied to our psychological state then people cannot help acting on it. Some people are programmed to be more likely to do wrong and others are programmed to do good. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Is there Objective Morality?
Top
Bottom