Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Is there Objective Morality?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kylie" data-source="post: 76737378" data-attributes="member: 343110"><p>How exactly would a person take something which is subjective and make it objective?</p><p></p><p>Does this mean I can take my objective opinion that Star trek is better than Star Wars and somehow make it OBJECTIVELY true? Please tell me how I can do this, as it will allow me to win many more arguments about this topic in several Facebook groups I'm in.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This seems to be working from the assumption that at least one God is real. Therefore, it's a circular argument. You're essentially saying that if we assume there is at least one God, you can show that there is at least one God. If there are no Gods at all, then there can not be any God whose will wins out, and thus the title of "most high God" will never be claimed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kylie, post: 76737378, member: 343110"] How exactly would a person take something which is subjective and make it objective? Does this mean I can take my objective opinion that Star trek is better than Star Wars and somehow make it OBJECTIVELY true? Please tell me how I can do this, as it will allow me to win many more arguments about this topic in several Facebook groups I'm in. This seems to be working from the assumption that at least one God is real. Therefore, it's a circular argument. You're essentially saying that if we assume there is at least one God, you can show that there is at least one God. If there are no Gods at all, then there can not be any God whose will wins out, and thus the title of "most high God" will never be claimed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Is there Objective Morality?
Top
Bottom