Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Is there Objective Morality?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ken-1122" data-source="post: 76736892" data-attributes="member: 277047"><p>Verify whether something is real/truth or not, anything else requires faith; a poor way of attempting to establish the truth.</p><p></p><p>Science is describing the only aspect of reality we know of. If another aspect of reality were found, science would be all over it.</p><p> </p><p>True! Because that is the only method we know of. As far as if there could be other methods we are unaware of is not something I’ve addressed.</p><p></p><p>I’m saying mankind (you included) have no proof. Again; all you might have is faith</p><p></p><p>No. Even if there are aspects of reality science doesn’t know of, they can still make claims about reality that it does know of; like that which can be verified via empirical means.</p><p>I’m saying mankind (you included) have no proof. Again; all you might have is faith</p><p></p><p>I’ve never disputed that other people have made claims of Jesus, I’ve disputed this claim that we know what Jesus actually said. Jesus never wrote anything down so the only thing we know is what other people claimed he said. You just choose to take some people at their word, and not others.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ken-1122, post: 76736892, member: 277047"] Verify whether something is real/truth or not, anything else requires faith; a poor way of attempting to establish the truth. Science is describing the only aspect of reality we know of. If another aspect of reality were found, science would be all over it. True! Because that is the only method we know of. As far as if there could be other methods we are unaware of is not something I’ve addressed. I’m saying mankind (you included) have no proof. Again; all you might have is faith No. Even if there are aspects of reality science doesn’t know of, they can still make claims about reality that it does know of; like that which can be verified via empirical means. I’m saying mankind (you included) have no proof. Again; all you might have is faith I’ve never disputed that other people have made claims of Jesus, I’ve disputed this claim that we know what Jesus actually said. Jesus never wrote anything down so the only thing we know is what other people claimed he said. You just choose to take some people at their word, and not others. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Ethics & Morality
Is there Objective Morality?
Top
Bottom