Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
In other words, you want me to keep quiet, while you guys claim we don't provide any physical evidence for the Creation event?The Creation and Evolution forum is a sub-forum of Physical and Life Sciences.
No, he suggests that you're in the wrong placeIn other words, you want me to keep quiet, while you guys claim we don't provide any physical evidence for the Creation event?
It is. It's usually used in the context of "zero evidence --> no reason to believe claim"But the moment I agree with you, I no longer qualify to express myself here?
I'm not sure what you're saying.
Wouldn't 'zero evidence' in itself be a scientific statement?
It demonstrates that the Genesis account is backwards.
Let me get this straight, Naraoia.No, he suggests that you're in the wrong placeWe know you don't claim to have evidence. However, other creationists have repeatedly done so, and other creationists have tried to sell creationism as science. The thread is about them.
It is. It's usually used in the context of "zero evidence --> no reason to believe claim"
That's incorrect.You are not thinking. It is absolutely in a scientifically correct sequence. The name of the scientific model is the Big Bang.
Not much to say about that.In the beginning...
No evidence that a deity had anything to do with it at all... but onward.God created...
Likely this meant "the sky" but you've interpreted it to mean "space". Either way, not exactly correct. There was a singularity and nothing else. It didn't expand to fill space. It expanded and space was where it expanded. So was matter. It's still expanding. Stars are still being born. It's not like this creation event happened once and stopped. The first generation of stars had to come and go before we could have any of the heavy elements that make up the earth.the heavens...
about eight billion years later. So it's wrong in the very first sentence.and the earth...
Plenty of creationists claim that creationism is scientific, or that there is some way in which creation is evident in the world around us. Telling them that there's no justification for that view, and asking them to provide evidence to back it up doesn't seem all that unreasonable in the science forums.You guys claim there is no evidence for the Creation event, and so you're here asking for evidence for the Creation event -- (and I won't even get into how ... ironic ... that is) -- and that's okay.
You're claiming creation isn't scientifically verifiable, so why would it be relevant in the science section?I, likewise, claim there is no evidence for the Creation event, and even prove it with a challenge, and I shouldn't be here?
You don't really agree with us. The only way I can imagine that you think that is in an "enemy of my enemy is my friend" kind of a way, but since you think that creation happened and not in any kind of scientifically verifiable way, again, why would it be relevant in the science section?Is this the 'thanks' I get for agreeing with you guys? or is it my faith icon that bothers you guys?
So? what do you guys care?Plenty of creationists claim that creationism is scientific, or that there is some way in which creation is evident in the world around us.
C'mon now. I think it is ridiculous to claim AVET shouldn't be posted about creationism in the "Creation and Evolution" subforum. Especially since there are few (if any) creationists who's real argument is not faith-based.Since your arguments are based solely in faith, I would suggest the Christianity and World Religion section (/f76).
.
Let me get this straight, Naraoia.
You guys claim there is no evidence for the Creation event, and so you're here asking for evidence for the Creation event -- (and I won't even get into how ... ironic ... that is) -- and that's okay.
I, likewise, claim there is no evidence for the Creation event, and even prove it with a challenge, and I shouldn't be here?
Is this the 'thanks' I get for agreeing with you guys? or is it my faith icon that bothers you guys?
I'm not sure that Naraoia was agreeing with Delphiki. She was explaining his position.
We certainly agree with you about the evidence. I personally support you posting here that there is no evidence for creationism. Keep on truck'in, buddy!
Let me get this straight, Naraoia.
You guys claim there is no evidence for the Creation event, and so you're here asking for evidence for the Creation event -- (and I won't even get into how ... ironic ... that is) -- and that's okay.
I, likewise, claim there is no evidence for the Creation event, and even prove it with a challenge, and I shouldn't be here?
Is this the 'thanks' I get for agreeing with you guys? or is it my faith icon that bothers you guys?
That. Oh, AV, don't get me wrong, you can grate on the nerves... but if I really wanted you gone, I could just ignore you like I do dadI'm not sure that Naraoia was agreeing with Delphiki. She was explaining his position.
Just don't expect anyone to be convincedWe certainly agree with you about the evidence. I personally support you posting here that there is no evidence for creationism. Keep on truck'in, buddy!
I care that people know the truth and speak the truth, surely you can appreciate that.So? what do you guys care?
See above. I don't think I'll ever know where you're coming from, because I cannot fathom the kind of thinking that allows one to remain a creationist in the presence of all the evidence against it.If you know better, why the inquisition?
I can understand someone being curious enough to want to see where we're coming from; but to stick around to harangue, ridicule and mock belies an emotional fixation on Something you claim you don't believe in in the first place.
If you are who I think you are, and you're from where I think you're from, you guys tried to undermine this Christian nation twice and got pwned.Am I being selfish? perhaps just a little.
Not much to say about that.In the beginning...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?