Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Is the Shroud of Turin Jesus' burial cloth?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mountainmike" data-source="post: 76859175" data-attributes="member: 392252"><p>Spare me the sophist games.</p><p>You cannot be more wrong, or more unscientific.</p><p></p><p>The pathology is indeed recognisable as that of a crucified man, crucified exactly as Jesus was, the only one documented as crucified that way. The pathology was invisible to a forger, and unknown at the time, and the correspondence to the sudarium shows it is very old , and Middle Eastern. Occam’s razor says it is real.</p><p> How the mark got there is irrelevant to authentication. But it is a fascinating post mortem event.</p><p></p><p>In the fake corner you have nothing except a fraudulent date, and if you contend it is fake you must explain the mark too. You contend an artist did it. How? </p><p></p><p>The reaction of sceptics to the shroud is faith based not science based.</p><p>Anyway . Until you are willing to discuss the science there is little more to be said.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mountainmike, post: 76859175, member: 392252"] Spare me the sophist games. You cannot be more wrong, or more unscientific. The pathology is indeed recognisable as that of a crucified man, crucified exactly as Jesus was, the only one documented as crucified that way. The pathology was invisible to a forger, and unknown at the time, and the correspondence to the sudarium shows it is very old , and Middle Eastern. Occam’s razor says it is real. How the mark got there is irrelevant to authentication. But it is a fascinating post mortem event. In the fake corner you have nothing except a fraudulent date, and if you contend it is fake you must explain the mark too. You contend an artist did it. How? The reaction of sceptics to the shroud is faith based not science based. Anyway . Until you are willing to discuss the science there is little more to be said. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Is the Shroud of Turin Jesus' burial cloth?
Top
Bottom