- Feb 5, 2002
- 182,201
- 65,934
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
In his article, “Roman Catholic Confusion on Contraception in the Bible” (3-15-12), anti-Catholic Reformed Protestant apologist James Swan observed:
Continued below.
www.patheos.com
You can’t make this stuff up:
Genesis 38 is about contraception:
Bottom line is that God killed Onan for some reason. The only plausible reason we have from the text itself is contraception. A straightforward reading of the text lends itself readily to that interpretation (though not absolutely of logical necessity).[source]
Genesis 38 is not about contraception:
“In the case of Onan, you are right that the common Catholic reliance on this passage as a proof text against contraception or masturbation is a weak one and wrong-headed” [Source: Mark Shea. What Does it Mean to Say Jesus has Fulfilled the Old Covenant?].
Continued below.

Is The Onan Story About Contraception?
Anti-Catholic apologist James Swan fails to show that Catholicism is confused regarding whether the Onan story is related to contraception. Even Luther & Calvin agree with us.
