No, I don't think it was. He was simply arguing that the fetus recapitulates the history of evolution.
Recapitulation is one of Darwin's old tricks, it doesn't stand up to close scrutiny:
The so-called gill slits of a human embryo have nothing to do with gills, and the human embryo does not pass through a fish stage or any other evolutionary stage. The development of the human embryo reveals steady progress toward a fully functional human body. Never in the course of development does a human embryo absorb oxygen from water as fish do with gills. (The human embryo is fully supplied with oxygen through the umbilical cord.) In fact, these “gill slits” are not even slits.
Something Fishy About Gill Slits!
Amazing how many of these arguments are just begging the question of proof. Creationists have had answers to these arguments for years.
Found an interesting paper on human brain evolution and the possible role of DUF1220 copy number. They argue that the expansion of the number of genes with the DUF1220 protein domain is strongly correlated with brain size and intelligence. Here is a snapshot of one of the figures:
View attachment 174592
https://www.researchgate.net/profil..._expansion/links/543be4550cf24a6ddb97b9e9.pdf
Gene duplication may play a more important role than substitution or indel mutations.
Interesting, lets see what you have here:
Here we provide an overview of the data supporting the view that DUF1220 copy number (dosage) increase is a major contributor to the increase in neuron number, brain size, and cognitive ability that has occurred specifically in the anthropoid sub-order (monkeys, apes, humans) of primates, including the evolutionarily rapid and extreme expansion of the human brain.
These comparisons are informative, what it underscores is differences:
DUF1220 copy number markedly increasing in monkeys, further in apes, and most extremely in humans where the greatest number of copies (∼272 haploid copies) is found
If I have seen one of these comparisons I've seen a dozen, the actual evolution of the divergence is assumed, not demonstrated.
This study surveyed essentially all human genes (e.g., approximately 24,000) and identified 1,004 that showed lineage-specific copy number changes among humans and the 4 great ape species. Of 140 genes identified that showed human lineage-specific (HLS) gain or loss in copy number, the most extreme change was found to be due to sequences encoding DUF1220, a protein domain of unknown function
A protein domain of unknown function has 1,004 human specific changes and the apes have 4. You want to pass that off as some kind of proof of gene duplication? It's not, these are differences, pure and simple.
Only two bases (out of 118) are changed between chimpanzee and chicken, indicating that the region was present and functional in our ancestor at least 310 million years (Myr) ago. No orthologue of HAR1 was detected in the frog (Xenopus tropicalis), any of the available fish genomes (zebrafish, Takifugu and Tetraodon), or in any invertebrate lineage, indicating that it originated no more than about 400Myr ago (An RNA gene expressed during cortical development evolved rapidly in human)
More differences, I'll just add DUF1220 if it turns out they actually have anything to do with brain related functions. They have found these protein products included neural genes but there isn't anything substantive demonstrating adaptive mechanism.
a gene that lacks DUF1220 sequences and, when mutated, has been implicated in microcephaly. (Wikipedia)
The Wikipedia offers a couple of citations for this:
Bond J, Woods CG (2006). "Cytoskeletal genes regulating brain size". Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 18 (1): 95–101
Dumas L, Kim YH, Karimpour-Fard A, Cox M, Hopkins J, Pollack JR, Sikela JM (2007) "Gene copy number variation spanning 60 million years of human and primate evolution".
Genome Res. 17 (9): 1266–77.
Thanks LM, I'll do the background reading and get back to you.
Have a nice day
Mark