• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Is the fourth commandment a moral issue?

freeindeed2

In Christ We Are FREE!
Feb 1, 2007
31,130
20,046
56
A mile high.
✟87,197.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
How do you know this?
Just Scripture...ever heard of a 'conscience'?

14For when Gentiles who do not have the Law do instinctively the things of the Law, these, not having the Law, are a law to themselves,

15in that they show the work of the Law written in their hearts, their conscience bearing witness and their thoughts alternately accusing or else defending them,
16on the day when, according to my gospel, God will judge the secrets of men through Christ Jesus. Rom. 2

What about Jimlarmore's experience in Vietnam regarding adultery and stealing? As it stands, he seems to have the superior experience in this area.
Interesting...I guess I could give you some more international experiences if you would like. The Gospel of Jesus Christ changes people in Vietnam just like it changes people in the U.S.

In Christ alone...
 
Upvote 0

Xenon

Regular Member
Aug 11, 2007
430
21
41
Schaumburg, Illinois
✟23,175.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single

Touché. Jim does raise an interesting point though. There are people who truly believe that those sins are morally correct. One could also argue that obeying God is a moral imperative. But that leads right back into the issue of whether God told us to obey the sabbath or not.

Interesting...I guess I could give you some more international experiences if you would like. The Gospel of Jesus Christ changes people in Vietnam just like it changes people in the U.S.

Do tell. I love mission/conversion stories. Met a woman at a nearby church who's life was a wreck before our pastor at the time showed her the way to God. She was an alcoholic, divorced, and had to give up her children to Child Services because she had so many problems. Both God and the pastor worked really hard on her, and her life completely turned around. She got her kids back, kicked the alcohol to the curb, and became a prominent member of the church. Her life wasn't without problems (sold her house, was going to transfer the money to her bank, and it got stolen; Satan's hard at work), but her faith was amazing to witness.

Edit: Just noticed that we have the same birthday. Happy birthday to you!
 
Upvote 0

Cribstyl

Veteran
Jun 13, 2006
8,993
2,068
✟108,451.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat

Jim, I dont argue with some prophecies because it's given so noone can have a clear or complete understanding.
You're making gumbo with peanut butter and jelly. No thank you.

blessings
CRIB
 
Upvote 0

djconklin

Moderate SDA
Sep 8, 2003
4,019
26
75
Visit site
✟26,806.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
One could also argue that obeying God is a moral imperative. But that leads right back into the issue of whether God told us to obey the sabbath or not.

The Sabbath presents in words God's seal of authority: He is our Creator. If you accept the fact that God is our creator then He alone has the right to tell us how to live. Since God is love He has asked us to love Him with all our heart, mind and strength--this principle covers the first 4 commandments.
 
Upvote 0

elijahorao

Member
Nov 20, 2005
86
3
68
Australia
✟22,728.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married


The 'morality' of it depends on the understanding/belief of each individual.
WHY?
Because the ten commands are the laws that define the limits of our relationships to God and humans.
For example, someone who has been taught that the fourth command is fulfilled in sunday keeping (not understanding the issue of the particular day), is in terms of their 'relationship attitude', innocent even though they are quilty at a legalistic level, provided their attitude is 'right' towards God. After all, the words we say and the things we do are all evaluated on attitude/relational principle. Thus, Abraham being prepared to kill his son as an act is wrong, but at the relational level, his attitude made it 'right'.
An important issue to realise is that the first four commandments relate to not keeping the sabbath holy in the same way that the last six commandments relate to not honouring your parents. Both these commands are about an attitude of respecting where we have come from and who we should honour. Once this principle becomes understood, the offence becomes real in it's relational aspect, thus it becomes 'moral'.
 
Upvote 0

Cribstyl

Veteran
Jun 13, 2006
8,993
2,068
✟108,451.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat

Welcome to the forum elijahorao,

Even though I can agree that the word "moral" can be defined as a "learned behavoir."
I believe it's more correctly defined as an innate absolute or instinctive behavior rather than an "on again", "off again" issue in relationship to days.

Arguments can be made that since God commanded murder, what is "moral religeously" is based on whatever God commands. With that understanding in mind, I concede to that definition.

Those who add morality to the ten commandments do so in attempt to reenforce the sabbath commandment, while rejecting wellknown Hebrews history about what is considered God's moral law. It is known as "The Noahide Laws".


In peace
CRIB
 
Upvote 0

ricker

Regular Member
Feb 25, 2007
2,430
71
65
Minnesota
✟27,344.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Can you illustrate or even state the MORALLITY of the Sabbath?
Forgive me if I'm not understanding, but I don't know if I agree with this line of thought. Can you find universal morality of the first 3 commandments outside of Judo-christianity? If we consider them moral, the fourth could be also, at least to the Israelites to whom they were given.
God bless! Ricker
 
Upvote 0

elijahorao

Member
Nov 20, 2005
86
3
68
Australia
✟22,728.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
God never commands murder. What makes murder murder, is the spirit in which it is done. It is also the same with sabbath keeping/breaking. The Spirit in which it is done decides the morality. What God judges as 'right' is moral, what God judges as wrong is immoral.If you decide to get subjective about that, then your argument/debate is with God, and I am betting that in the end God will be found right and all those who argue/debate with Him will be found wrong.
When Samuel chopped up the ratbag king who Saul was supposed to have slain, it was not murder, it was righteous culling.
If I keep sabbath simply because it is a regulation and so I do it in order to please God for the sake of finding favor with Him, then I have reduced it to a ceremony and I may as well bow before statues as well as statutes. If however my motive is to honour Him because I want to please Him for His sake (eg love Him) which realy comes through understanding His character as revealed in Jesus, and I happen to (ignorantly) get the day wrong, I still please Him because of my 'motive'.
I hasten to add, that for those who understand the sabbath issue, there is a correct/right day, it is The seventh day of the week and no amount of philosophy or debate can make it right if we trample it underfoot in favor of a more convenient day.
The 'morality' always lies in the motive/Spirit/attitude.
As for sabbath keeping being an Israelitish command? Aren't we all of Israel who prevail with God? Doesn't the new jerusalem have those twelve names on the gates?We are talking about spiritual realities here, not genetic realities. Those who are saved are all of the 'Israel of God'. There is no respecting of persons or discerning of race in the kingdom of heaven, but WHY in one kingdom would God have one group of people doing one thing and another group doing another? It does not add up. Read the end of Isaiah 66 and you can see that God says "all flesh". How can that be misstranslated? Then again, how is it that so many misstranslate the word "REMEMBER"? See Malachi 4:4 there is a direct pointer to sabbathkeeping here, not only the numbers, but the opening word, and then research the verse in it's entirety. Now, research the chronology of this instruction. Are we trampling the wicked under foot yet? Clearly this speaks of a time yet future (though soon)
It is 'moral' to those who understand, it is just another day to those who don't. Read Hebrews 4, focus on verse 4. The word used in these scriptures is DAY, and PLACE(in time) It is an appointment, but those who make the appointment will have faith and those who do not enter in will not enter in because of unbelief. Let God be true and men liars, because it is God's Own word which declares that those who do not enter in do not enter because of unbelief. Now belief is tied in with 'faith', and 'faith' with 'trust' and 'trust' with 'relationship' and 'relationship' with 'morality' because the focus becomes on attitude/motive/Spirit.
To some of you this will make sense, to others it will be obscure.
 
Upvote 0

Jimlarmore

Senior Veteran
Oct 25, 2006
2,572
51
75
✟25,490.00
Faith
SDA

Thanks for this post and yes it makes perfect sense to me.

God Bless you,
Jim Larmore
 
Upvote 0

ricker

Regular Member
Feb 25, 2007
2,430
71
65
Minnesota
✟27,344.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

This completely disregards the covenant issue. To put it simply, the Mosaic covenant includes the ten commandment laws and others and was given only to Israel. The sign of this covenant was the Sabbath. We as Christians are not under the old covenant. I wish you or someone else would explain this "spiritual Israel" concept from the Bible without statements that mean nothing theologically such as "12 gates in the new Jeruselem".
God bless! Ricker
 
Upvote 0

Jimlarmore

Senior Veteran
Oct 25, 2006
2,572
51
75
✟25,490.00
Faith
SDA

First off lets be very clear here. In the Bible we never find God making a covenant with any nation but Israel, period. So, that being the case we need to ask ourselves , if the Israel spoken of in the future prophecies is the literal nation of Israel or what we call the "spiritual nation of Israel"?

I believe it is the "spiritual nation of Israel" because of what happened in the New Testament times at the end of the 70 week prophecy of Dan 9:24. What we see is that the literal nation of Israel is rejected as the keepers of the oracles of God and God turning now to the gentiles:

Acts 13:44-47

42

And when the Jews were gone out of the synagogue, the Gentiles besought that these words might be preached to them the next sabbath.
43

Now when the congregation was broken up, many of the Jews and religious proselytes followed Paul and Barnabas: who, speaking to them, persuaded them to continue in the grace of God.
44

And the next sabbath day came almost the whole city together to hear the word of God.
45

But when the Jews saw the multitudes, they were filled with envy, and spake against those things which were spoken by Paul, contradicting and blaspheming.
46

Then Paul and Barnabas waxed bold, and said, It was necessary that the word of God should first have been spoken to you: but seeing ye put it from you, and judge yourselves unworthy of everlasting life, lo, we turn to the Gentiles.
47

For so hath the Lord commanded us, saying, I have set thee to be a light of the Gentiles, that thou shouldest be for salvation unto the ends of the earth.
Isa 49:6

This is the proclaimation of the gospel being sent to the gentiles and the official rejection of Israel as a favored nation. One may say well so if the literal nation of Israel was rejected then the new covenant given in the new testament is for the gentiles,right? What we find is the new covenant was not made with the gentiles but with Israel as well.

Jer 31:31-33 and Heb 8:8-13 are nearly identical. The new covenant spoken of in the new testament was prophecied to be given in the Old Testament. The only law that was known at the time of Jeremiah was the ten commandments and it was this law that was behind this new covenant. The new covenant didn't have to have the ceremonial laws anymore and the laws would be written on the heart not on stone.

31

Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:
Heb 8:8, 13
32

Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD:
Heb 8:9
33

But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.
Heb 8:10, 10:16

So we can conclude that God gave this new covenant to Israel. So the new covenant is laws on the heart not stone. So how does this stack up against the idea of what the new covenant is to you? If God had turned to the gentiles then it had to be "spiritual Israel" that this new covenant was given to, and the new covenant was God's laws written on the heart.

Also we find in Gal 3:27-29

27

For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.
28

There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
29

And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.

Here we have it clearly spelled out that if we be in Christ's we are Abraham's seed and heir of the promise. The promise to Abraham was that the entire world would be blessed thru his seed which became "Israel".

God Bless
Jim Larmore
 
Upvote 0