Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I noticed your icon was Pentecostal. Have you seen the documentary Marjoe, by any chance? If so, what did you think?
If the geologic column is not a reliable way to date something, how was it that Neil Shubin was able to find Tiktaalik?
You do realize that there is absolutely no archeological evidence to support this claim whatsoever. Egyptian history never once mentions the Israelites. There is no extrabiblical evidence to support your belief.But can you give reference that it caused the world population to decrease over that year?
Every reference I have seen shows the world population still rising, even though one part of the world decreases.
The Israelite Nation was growing at such a huge rate that the Egyptians were killing of their children at the time of Moses. That is why Moses was found in a basket floating down the Nile.
Thank you. You have demonstrated you have no understanding of the biodiversity and biodistribution of life as relates to the geologic column.As I stated, certain weights and types will fall of into different layers of earth, which will develop a repeatable pattern, still, Geologic 'time scale' from depth is not reliable or rational if you consider a flood.
As I stated, certain weights and types will fall of into different layers of earth, which will develop a repeatable pattern, still, Geologic 'time scale' from depth is not reliable or rational if you consider a flood.
Yup -- it would drown your whole set of paradigms, wouldn't it?Well, we'e got plenty of reasons not to consider a flood, so that's easy enough.
Conversely, it would really make your paradigms afloat, eh. Keep looking.Yup -- it would drown your whole set of paradigms, wouldn't it?
Your whole infrastructure, that took hundreds of years to build, up would sink, eh?
Thank you. You have demonstrated you have no understanding of the biodiversity and biodistribution of life as relates to the geologic column.
Carry on.
Yes, and if we keep tearing down mountains and cutting down trees, the earth is going to rotate faster and faster due to the decreasing orographic radius, causing night and day to come sooner, meaning the earth will have to speed its revolution to match one orbit per 365 rotations, which will increase our distance from the sun, meaning global warming will have to accelerate to compensate for the loss in average temperature, and eventually we'll drop below the anthropic norms and end up going extinct because evolution is too slow.What.. the earth is like a giant centrifuge, isn't it? I mean, it spins and everything!
Did you ever think of that?
I noticed your icon was Pentecostal. Have you seen the documentary Marjoe, by any chance? If so, what did you think?
So how would one distinguish between a "showmen" and the 'real deal?'Php 1:15 Some indeed preach Christ even of envy and strife; and some also of good will:
Php 1:16 The one preach Christ of contention, not sincerely, supposing to add affliction to my bonds:
Php 1:17 But the other of love, knowing that I am set for the defence of the gospel.
Php 1:18 What then? notwithstanding, every way, whether in pretence, or in truth, Christ is preached; and I therein do rejoice, yea, and will rejoice.
This is nothing new to Christianity, as even Paul witnesses to this.
It is sad that it happens, but as Christians lose desire to hear the word of God, and desire instead a show, this is what you will get, showmen.
But can you give reference that it caused the world population to decrease over that year?
Every reference I have seen shows the world population still rising, even though one part of the world decreases.
And you think the geologic column is sorted that way? *blink*My point was, geologic columns are not a reliable way to date anything. Just put different matter in a cup of water, swirl it around, and you will see the more dense go to the bottom, and lighter on top.
I hope you're kidding.
That post reminds me so much of this time I was talking to someone who opposed wind power on the sole reason that she thought we'd eventually run out of wind.
And you think the geologic column is sorted that way? *blink*
I'm not sure about densities, but one of the ways sediments sort in water is by grain size (bigger at the bottom).
If I remember my geology field trips correctly, there's a counterexample to that about fifteen minutes from where I sit now, in the form of fine-grained shales sitting under a big pile of much coarser sandstone layers. It's hardly the only example, either. The rock record just cannot be explained by simple sorting.
I hope you're kidding.
So how would one distinguish between a "showmen" and the 'real deal?'
And you think the geologic column is sorted that way? *blink*
I'm not sure about densities, but one of the ways sediments sort in water is by grain size (bigger at the bottom).
If I remember my geology field trips correctly, there's a counterexample to that about fifteen minutes from where I sit now, in the form of fine-grained shales sitting under a big pile of much coarser sandstone layers. It's hardly the only example, either. The rock record just cannot be explained by simple sorting.
you'll see that there's no way you can explain their presence using the global flood model.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?