Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The geologic column is not my Bible.
Sure, that fact demonstrates that a false claim was made -- as I stated in my post. I was trying to figure out what fact you had offered that demonstrated a false claim was made. I was just trying to figure out what you were saying. Really not worth this back and forth.The fact that people know evolution very well and are still not evolutionists demonstrates that a false claim was made.
I'm not denying it, I'm denying its interpretation.This article shows that there are 25 locations where a complete geological column exists, including in parts of North Dakota, Tunisia, Turkey, Poland, Afghanistan, Australia, China, Russia, Alaska, Iran, Bulgaria, Egypt, Morocco, Libya, Oman, Canada, Mexico and Colombia. This is not something one can just deny.
Your ignorance precludes you from denying anything regarding the geologic column.I'm not denying it, I'm denying its interpretation.
Your ignorance precludes you from denying anything regarding the geologic column.
It's not complete, nor is it the word of god.2 Peter 1:16 ¶ For we have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty.
And although I wasn't an eyewitness, we have a more sure Word of prophecy -- the completed word of God.
Lolwut? Oh, I see, it appears I misunderstood you. You didn't mean being derogatory to Christians as a group, because they are Christians. My bad.LOL, um, way to debunk yourself.
And I guess I would disagree with him. Was that an argument from authority, by the way?Rene Descartes would disagree.
???Again, way to debunk yourself.
Well, then all of these are reasonable explanations - though not equally likely -, right? That means you need further tests to distinguish between them. So you get outside, go to work, look around you. All the trees and roofs are dripping wet. Rain is sounding more and more likely, ain't it?From the water being left on... waterline broke... neighbors pool has a leak...
I know basic logic, thank you.A deductive argument is valid if the conclusion does follow necessarily from the premises.
How so?That is the problem with the many conclusions of long term evolution, it does not follow the premises.
Citation needed.It is more concerned with defending a philosophy then giving a rational explanation in accordance to what we know.
You said, and I quote, "Funny, I even posted the definition for you, and you still do not get it."I never said you didn't I have said many have here, AND I was being precise with you.
Did I claim you were? No. That doesn't change the fact that everyone else in this thread does, and therefore if you just mention "species", that's what they'll think you mean. IOW, don't blame the others for "not getting it".Did I claim to be using the biological definition of the word species? No I did not.
Where? "Reverse the order of reproduction" is your idea of how it could happen, not a demonstration. There's a difference...Read above
So why don't you hold your peace? The stones are more convincing!I'm not denying it, I'm denying its interpretation.
Jesus said the geologic columns would attest of Him, not against Him.
Luke 19:40 And he answered and said unto them, I tell you that, if these should hold their peace, the stones would immediately cry out.
And a new video to expose why some of the anti-science movement is to be blamed on Scientists, because they let bias and presupposition get in their way of revealing real evidence that proves otherwise.
YouTube - The Complexity of Cells Debunks Macro Evolution
Dr Carl Baugh has copyright, and wants his videos mirrored for the spreading of the Gospel. Dino Creation Ministries does not exist.
There is a troll filing false DMCA reports. I have counter notified.
I don't think it is someone here, but in case it is...
I'm not denying it, I'm denying its interpretation.
Jesus said the geologic columns would attest of Him, not against Him.
Luke 19:40 And he answered and said unto them, I tell you that, if these should hold their peace, the stones would immediately cry out.
Hehe.. Hang around Youtube long enough and you'll see which side of the argument loves to file false DMCA claims. Probably the most notable example of what I'm talking about is an old user that went by the name VenomfangX.
Inanimate objects do not "decide" anything. It is absurd to think so.
It was a simple question really, at what point in the geologic column do we first begin to see simple celled organisms?
What has Arkansas got to do with anything?
Nope, no event has ever reduced the world population
I noticed your icon was Pentecostal. Have you seen the documentary Marjoe, by any chance? If so, what did you think?My point was, geologic columns are not a reliable way to date anything. Just put different matter in a cup of water, swirl it around, and you will see the more dense go to the bottom, and lighter on top.
I certainly believe a flood happened, so that is why I said what I did.
If the geologic column is not a reliable way to date something, how was it that Neil Shubin was able to find Tiktaalik?My point was, geologic columns are not a reliable way to date anything. Just put different matter in a cup of water, swirl it around, and you will see the more dense go to the bottom, and lighter on top.
I certainly believe a flood happened, so that is why I said what I did.
Utterly wrong.
- The Black Death between 1347 and 1351 was responsible the deaths of one third of the population of Asia and Europe.
- European settlement of the Americas resulted in large scale depopulation of the natives. Smallpox, influenza, measles, malaria, pertussis, cholera etc (all diseases that were imported from Europe and that the natives had no immunity to), added to wars and massacres saw the native population of the Americas decline by around 90% (from around 100 million down to 10 million).
Neither of these events are factored into the televangelist's calculations.
Also, if you work backwards using the constant rate of growth stated, you arrive at the situation where the total population of the world during the time of Moses would have had to have been considerably less than the few million children of Israel living at that time, which is obviously absurd. Quite simply, the calculation doesn't work.
Can I please get how they find out these probabilities? I'm rather interested.
Sure, that fact demonstrates that a false claim was made -- as I stated in my post. I was trying to figure out what fact you had offered that demonstrated a false claim was made. I was just trying to figure out what you were saying. Really not worth this back and forth.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?