Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Did I ask for an example of speciation silly one?
I asked for one species that evolved into a completely different species.
Do you know the difference?
^ ad homenimYou should get a better job.
Brush up on logic 101.
It was a person who noticed that it was filed. Does it take a scientist to discover that? nope, but one sure can be fooled by it.
Do decide that one species can become a completely different species, YES you do, OR to decide that life can come from a ROCK over a million or few years, YES, you do.
My goodness, I really did skim-read the list I posted.
Lookey here:
Originally Posted by Cabal
1. Muntzig, A, Triticale Results and Problems, Parey, Berlin, 1979. Describes whole new *genus* of plants, Triticosecale, of several species, formed by artificial selection. These plants are important in agriculture.
If you think they all did not speciate, please post individual refutations of each claimed case of speciation in that list.
Without science?
Funny, without creation, there would be nothing to hear.
And sadly you kept making fallacies, didn't you?
OF COURSE THEY DID! Do you not think ministers called Piltdown Man a fake all those years?
AND, only certain people are allowed to see these 'great pieces of evidence'.
You commit fallacies. That is about it. I called you on them. If anything, I have been owning you.
I see you do not know the difference between a species becoming a completely different species, and speciation. For someone who does this for a living, you are pretty dull.
Really? And what does Abiogenesis claim? Hope you don't make your warm pond with water that comes from any rocks.
I thought it was the only language you knew.
Yes, it was.
Funny, what has been asked of me has been nothing but fallacious. All you do is cry because I call you on it.
Appeal to Authority silly person.
Which is hard to explain thoughts, dreams, and imagination, isn't it?
Actually, that is what you do.
Ah, so it was a person and not a platypus scientist.
Strawman. No scientist says we come from rocks. Again, showing you're lack of understanding of evolution.
Such a disrespect for the very system that's provided you with things even as simple as the common light bulb. No wonder the one in your head doesn't seem to be working.
^ ad hominem
I leave their clock running until their flag falls, then get the tournament director to give me the point --Debating naturalists is like playing chess with pigeons, they crap on the board, knock the pieces over, then fly away claiming victory.
You really have nothing, don't you?
argumentum verbosium
I already knew you had nothing, just funny to watch.
Debating naturalists is like playing chess with pigeons, they crap on the board, knock the pieces over, then fly away claiming victory.
You show your lack of understanding between the difference in evolution and ABIOGENESIS.
See, evolution is the hypothesis that tries to explain the origin of "species". Abiogenesis is the hypothesis that tries to explain the origin of "life".
Really, you should study this stuff before posting.
Without science?
Funny, without creation, there would be nothing to hear.
Claiming it is a fake is one thing
Given that you demonstrably don't even know the basic fallacies
A bit more complicated than "coming from a rock".
And you're crying over being asked to provide evidence for your claims.
you made a universal claim about what science claims, so turn to the scientific literature
It's called the brain, and it's quite physical.
I'll worry about this when it comes from someone who actually knows what speciation and basic logical fallacies are.
Don't get me started on Pluto again.Bit rich coming from someone who didn't even read the sources yet magically knows that they're all wrong.
Ya -- we're all hypocrites, aren't we?I'm glad that post made an impact.
(And again, not an ad hom, as I still addressed the point!)
To be honest, given that HAPMinistries likes to whine so much about alleged ad homs on him, if he wants that objection to be taken seriously he should not be such a hypocrite himself on the ad hom issue.
Don't get me started on Pluto again.
What's funny is, I know this. I didn't think that you actually learned it from Cabal a few posts ago. Good for you! Now go hop in the shower and wash that wretched evil science knowledge off!
This one's called equivocation. You're actually in the middle of a discussion regarding creationism
Ya -- we're all hypocrites, aren't we?
Do you see the word "Creationism" in there? I sure don't...
given that HAPMinistries likes to whine so much about alleged ad homs on him, if he wants that objection to be taken seriously he should not be such a hypocrite himself on the ad hom issue.
It's not the OP, but where the current discussion has currently derailed to.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?