Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
From his birth? From the time when he was begotten not made?
vox populi is a logical fallacyEveryone but you knows the answer
vox populi is a logical fallacy
However I'm trying to work out what you mean. First you said that they had to be a witness. Then you said that they had to be a witness to three particular things. Now you're saying since they were called to be an Apostle.
When you can make up your mind what it is you think, let me know
I don't know. What's that got to do with your logical fallacy?What's the latin for council?
Okay. Peace and out.
If what is being taught does not line up with the full context of scripture why should we believe what is being taught?If someone would like to show from scripture where we should only use scripture that would be fantastic (literally)
So far we've seen examples of one group of non-Christians using scripture. Doe this mean that we should ONLY use scripture? It doesn't say so. There's nothing saying "You should do as they did".
Unfortunately this example is presented over and over again as if it proves "ONLY" but it doesn't... unless one adds assumptions NOT IN scripture.
Does tradition contradict scripture?If what is being taught does not line up with the full context of scripture why should we believe what is being taught?
Because scripture can be interpreted many ways. That's why there's 100'000s of Protestant branchesWhy not take what is being taught to the scripture and see if indeed what they say is indeed what God has Said through His word?
For we know that the Scripture is breathed by God.
Where does it say tradition is breathed by God?in some cases yes it does. Not only does it contradict it adds to.Does tradition contradict scripture?
Says youBecause scripture can be interpreted many ways. That's why there's 100'000s of Protestant branches
It was just a reminderWho's denied this?
Where's it say only scripture is from God?
Where does it say tradition is breathed by God?
You deny that there's 100,000's of Protestant denominations?Says you
When not arguing something I always like a reminder of a point I've not made. Thanks. Blessings on their wayIt was just a reminder
If someone would see it when it's put in their face, that would be gettin' real. Realyquote=Montalban;If someone would like to show from scripture where we should only use scripture that would be fantastic (literally)
.So far we've seen examples of one group of non-Christians using scripture
Besides that being an incomplete thought, it's upside down: Only scripture is usefull.Doe this mean that we should ONLY use scripture?
"More noble", it says. Is that something to religiously avoid?It doesn't say so. There's nothing saying "You should do as they did".
So then it's safe to say you haven't persuaded anyone?Unfortunately this example is presented over and over again as if it proves "ONLY" but it doesn't... unless one adds assumptions NOT IN scripture.
Please present this.If someone would see it when it's put in their face, that would be gettin' real.
Do you always look to non-Christians for examples?Yes, even they! BTW, nonChristians were one realy big group at the time.
How?Besides that being an incomplete thought,
How so?it's upside down:
Where's it say that?Only scripture is usefull.
By being 'more noble' where does it say to only use scripture ever?"More noble", it says. Is that something to religiously avoid?
Appeal to the massesSo then it's safe to say you haven't persuaded anyone?
You've made the assumption that the Bereans using scripture means that we should ONLY use it.What assumptions, would be necessary to add to prove "ONLY"?
[33] Wisdom resteth in the heart of him that hath understanding: but that which is in the midst of foolsis made known.
For what reason?quote=Montalban;Please present this.
Only when you shove 'em in my face as if it makes a difference or as if they weren't "PRE-CHRISTIAN", thank you for asking in so gracious & unaccusing manner.Do you always look to non-Christians for examples?
It doesn't say what for. Could be for toilet paper for all we know because as many times as we say it to you, you interpret it completely whack, which to me would demonstrate the problem with oral tradition in the first place, except I usualy discount those people to begin with.How?
Who said ever? I'm only talkin' when verifying truth, not "ever". You have to pay complete attention to get the complete thought.By being 'more noble' where does it say to only use scripture ever?
Cute admission of failure, that.Appeal to the masses
Did they "ask around"? No, so neither do I.You've made the assumption that the Bereans using scripture means that we should ONLY use it.
Only with you.Perhaps you're having difficulty with the word 'only'???
I like tis one:There's a really good dictionary site here
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?