Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Leisure and Society
Hobbies, Interests & Entertainment
Conspiracy Theories
Is "Pizzagate" "fake news" or a real indiction of high level pedophilia?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kevin Ambrose" data-source="post: 70862918" data-attributes="member: 395346"><p>According to the Temple of Set/Michael Aquino Set was the first manifestation of what they call the "Prince of Darkness". The worship of Set was rare in Egypt. One dynasty under the rule of the invading Hyksos chose Set due to his familiarity to their god Ba'al (now regarded as a demon in Judeo-Christian lore). Set became the god of foreigners due to this and after the Hyksos were expelled he was a rather non-important deity until the reign of Ramses.</p><p></p><p>The Ramses family came from Avaris, the capital of the Hyksos dynasty, and they still worshiped Set. Thus Ramses sons: Setnakt ("Set is Mighty", Seti ("Man of Set"), etc. When we talk about the "god of Pharaoh" in the story of the Exodus a lot of these occultists claim they are speaking of Set, not Ra, due to the origin of the Ramses family. By this when one says "Satan" (meaning Adversary), they claim this in relation to the conflict between the God of Moses and the god of Pharaoh.</p><p></p><p>So they use this as a justification to equate Set as the father of consciousness/free will that predates our faith. It's why Aquino chose Set over "Satan" for his reformed church post-1975.</p><p></p><p>I fear we've derailed this thread a bit. Maybe I'll make a thread just to answer questions like these. People should be well educated on what these Satanists believe.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kevin Ambrose, post: 70862918, member: 395346"] According to the Temple of Set/Michael Aquino Set was the first manifestation of what they call the "Prince of Darkness". The worship of Set was rare in Egypt. One dynasty under the rule of the invading Hyksos chose Set due to his familiarity to their god Ba'al (now regarded as a demon in Judeo-Christian lore). Set became the god of foreigners due to this and after the Hyksos were expelled he was a rather non-important deity until the reign of Ramses. The Ramses family came from Avaris, the capital of the Hyksos dynasty, and they still worshiped Set. Thus Ramses sons: Setnakt ("Set is Mighty", Seti ("Man of Set"), etc. When we talk about the "god of Pharaoh" in the story of the Exodus a lot of these occultists claim they are speaking of Set, not Ra, due to the origin of the Ramses family. By this when one says "Satan" (meaning Adversary), they claim this in relation to the conflict between the God of Moses and the god of Pharaoh. So they use this as a justification to equate Set as the father of consciousness/free will that predates our faith. It's why Aquino chose Set over "Satan" for his reformed church post-1975. I fear we've derailed this thread a bit. Maybe I'll make a thread just to answer questions like these. People should be well educated on what these Satanists believe. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Leisure and Society
Hobbies, Interests & Entertainment
Conspiracy Theories
Is "Pizzagate" "fake news" or a real indiction of high level pedophilia?
Top
Bottom