Is it better to "turn the other cheek", or to "stand up for yourself"?
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Generally, to stand up for your rights.
No one else is going to do that for you, and if you don't stand up for your rights, people will assume that you don't care about them and become more eager and willing to take more of those away.
[...]
He who takes up the sword, dies by the sword.
False dichotomy.
I never said anything about killing people, and people can in 99+% of cases stand up for themselves without any violence whatsoever.
However, I can't fault the American revolutionaries for being willing to defend their freedoms. [...] There are worse things than death.
There is a old joke about a big, strong, tough farmboy. A man slapped him and he replied 'The good book says to turn the other cheek. The man struck him on the other cheek.
The farmboy replied 'I just ran out of cheeks' as he advanced on the man.
I personally tend that way.
BUT God have mercy on you if you hurt an old lady or child in my presence.
If you wouldn't normally do it, it is a violent act.
You have distinguished between the battle and the war, well done.
Meaning?![]()
In what way? How do you define those terms?
What do you think it means? It means "standing up for your rights" is violent.
He who takes up the sword, dies by the sword.
What do you think it means? It means "standing up for your rights" is violent.
In what way have you distinguished between the battle and the war? You have determined that international freedom (international because it concerns freedom in a nation among nations) fought for on home soil is a worthy cause. The reason it is a worthy cause is because it is not merely a battle between one member of society and another, but a war between every member of society and another. When everyone is involved, it is war.
When it could easily be just you who is fighting, it is a battle.
Would your avatar be depicting three swords and three shields?He who takes up the sword, dies by the sword.
Violent in what sense?
It may risk violence *if* the oppressor is willing to use violence to maintain power, and then one may have to use violence in self-defense.
Often, the oppressor backs down without violence.
[...]
In a democratic society, standing up for one's rights usually means using persuasion and the ballot box to get other people to recognize one's rights. No violence there.
I don't see how any society can survive if everyone "turns the other cheek" instead of standing up for themselves. It is doomed to become a society of masters and slaves, and injustice everywhere.
That is rather the point. Violence begets violence.
I would define that as passive violence. Still to be avoided.
Mastery is a function of Peace. Slaves are a function of War. I should think then that a society that turns the other cheek would be a society of Masters and not slaves.
Injustice in a Peaceful society is nothing more than laziness. Would you fight laziness with the Sword? Or would you rather fight it in word and deed? Examine yourself, what evidence do you actually have that a man who turns the other cheek immediately turns to injustice?
Keep in mind a policy of turning the other cheek (appeasement) is what directly lead to World War 2.
In the real world turning the other cheek is often a good course to take, however there are times when you have to stick up for yourself and be the aggressor. Otherwise you're simply going to get walked over for your entire life.