Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Sure. But history is completely fabricated in the mind of the story teller.
Any criminal attorney will explain that for you.
And you are still wrong. Causality does not say that an effect cannot be bigger than the cause either.You are correct. My mistake. It's called causality.
Causality (physics)
Nature of time and causality in Physics
Quantum causal relations: A causes B causes A - Phys.org
I understand the desire to always wish one were correct.
But history shows that old fictions are replaced by new ones.
Which are later replaced by new stories.
It's an established fact.
Meanwhile, creationism isn't.
When in a corner, attack the opposing viewpoint. I get that.
Unfortunately for your effort, I'm not arguing Creationism at this time.
And you are still wrong. Causality does not say that an effect cannot be bigger than the cause either.
Once again your links do not help your case that an effect cannot be larger than the cause. It sounds like you may have been listening to an apologist. Perhaps William Lane Craig. Apologists are notoriously bad at physics.
This is one of the reasons why 1 piece of objective evidence will instantly overrule a thousand testimonies saying otherwise.
I doubt that, unless you are talking about just high school physics teachers. I remember being shocked when I talked with a guy that was going to school so that he could teach physics in high school. I asked him how his calculus was going and he surprised the heck out of me when he said that he did not need it.Nope. Just my physics teachers.
Another link for cause and effect , which may help your stand.
http://www.nature.com/nphys/journal/v10/n4/full/nphys2930.html?foxtrotcallback=true
The opposite is true. Valid testimonies usually dismiss potential evidence.
For example, if a witness places the suspect not on the scene, any evidence
that they were there is dismissed. Even DNA evidence.
Howdy, Zoii.Hello Vet... Id agree but i thought u were a supporter of creationism?
Creationism takes that stand that matter, systems, intelligence, and people are the result of cause and effect. The first cause of any solid matter, working systems, and ongoing intelligence must be equal to or larger than the end result. So creationists have evidence that what we see had a cause and an intelligent source based on the scientific basis of cause and effect.
And you are still wrong. Causality does not say that an effect cannot be bigger than the cause either. Once again your links do not help your case that an effect cannot be larger than the cause.
I just did.Please, cite an example.
Wrong. You can have 20 witnesses claiming through personal testimony, someone was not at the scene. If the prosecution produces a video, demonstrating the person was there, those 20 witnesses get impeached. Video and physical evidence dont lie, people do.The opposite is true. Valid testimonies usually dismiss potential evidence.
For example, if a witness places the suspect not on the scene, any evidence
that they were there is dismissed. Even DNA evidence.
I just did. If a suspect has an alibi, they are no longer suspects.
Howdy, Zoii.
Indeed I am.
But the creation week consisted of a series of one miracle after another, with no evidence being generated.
Evidence is a byproduct of an event.
A footprint here, a fingerprint there, something left behind or out of place.
God isn't sloppy.
Wrong. You can have 20 witnesses claiming through personal testimony, someone was not at the scene. If the prosecution produces a video, demonstrating the person was there, those 20 witnesses get impeached. Video and physical evidence dont lie, people do.
Where did you get that idea from?Video is generally not allowed in court.
Wrong. You can have 20 witnesses claiming through personal testimony, someone was not at the scene. If the prosecution produces a video, demonstrating the person was there, those 20 witnesses get impeached. Video and physical evidence dont lie, people do.
Nope, you made up a claim. You need an actual instance.
Complexity is not empirical evidence for design. The hallmark of design is simplicity.
How would you know?Your version of God is very sloppy.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?