Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yes, Biologists model what happens in reality in their heads. The information is in their heads. Information theory is a model that helps them predict what DNA will do. The map is not the territory.Biologists think of life in terms of information, that is, information storage and processing
Well "grinding it down" to atoms is an artificial reductionism. We dont live in a world of atomic powder. We live among rather elaborate structures, some of which are a medium for various instructions. This has been ongoing on earth since long before there were minds to understand it.This is an esoteric discussion that is my fault for beginning. But, I argue that all information is what a sapient being infers from the world around it. There is no information in gravity. That there is an inverse square law involved isn't coded into gravity. It is a modelling in our brains that allows us to predict orbits, etc.
The inverse square (if that is the thing I should be thinking about) exists in our brains. Information is us storing in our brains what we know. The information doesn't reside in this or that mass. It resides in our brains.
ETA: Reminds me of this quote from Hogfather (Terry Pratchett)
“All right," said Susan. "I'm not stupid. You're saying humans need... fantasies to make life bearable."
REALLY? AS IF IT WAS SOME KIND OF PINK PILL? NO. HUMANS NEED FANTASY TO BE HUMAN. TO BE THE PLACE WHERE THE FALLING ANGEL MEETS THE RISING APE.
"Tooth fairies? Hogfathers? Little—"
YES. AS PRACTICE. YOU HAVE TO START OUT LEARNING TO BELIEVE THE LITTLE LIES.
"So we can believe the big ones?"
YES. JUSTICE. MERCY. DUTY. THAT SORT OF THING.
"They're not the same at all!"
YOU THINK SO? THEN TAKE THE UNIVERSE AND GRIND IT DOWN TO THE FINEST POWDER AND SIEVE IT THROUGH THE FINEST SIEVE AND THEN SHOW ME ONE ATOM OF JUSTICE, ONE MOLECULE OF MERCY. AND YET—Death waved a hand. AND YET YOU ACT AS IF THERE IS SOME IDEAL ORDER IN THE WORLD, AS IF THERE IS SOME...SOME RIGHTNESS IN THE UNIVERSE BY WHICH IT MAY BE JUDGED.
"Yes, but people have got to believe that, or what's the point—"
MY POINT EXACTLY.”
Nor will you ever find an atom of information.
Yes, Biologists model what happens in reality in their heads. The information is in their heads. Information theory is a model that helps them predict what DNA will do. The map is not the territory.
I didn't say they based it on their imaginations. I said they modelled what they saw. The model is adequate to the degree they can use the model to predict what should or should not happen in the physical reality.I don't believe that's true at all. I think biologists describe what they see based on evidence, like any scientist would... Not on their imagination, as you seem to suggest.
You can grind the universe down and find Hydrogen, Helium, etc. You can grind DNA and get adenine (A), cytosine (C), guanine (G), and thymine (T). You CANNOT grind down anything and get information. It is in the mind. It is your inference about how the world works.Well "grinding it down" to atoms is an artificial reductionism. We dont live in a world of atomic powder. We live among rather elaborate structures, some of which are a medium for various instructions. This has been ongoing on earth since long before there were minds to understand it.
This is false.
There's lots of real features of the universe that disappear when we grind everything down.You can grind the universe down and find Hydrogen, Helium, etc. You can grind DNA and get adenine (A), cytosine (C), guanine (G), and thymine (T). You CANNOT grind down anything and get information. It is in the mind. It is your inference about how the world works.
It isn't reductionist at all. The OP topic is "Is Information Physically Real?" If by physical, you mean the physical processes that make/store our memories then, yes, it is physical. If by physical, you mean that information exists independently of the mind, then my answer is no.
Life is a concept. It represents real physical and chemical processes. It does NOT exists in and of itself. If we say that life is "out there" it means we expect to find entities metabolizing other entities in order to survive long enough to procreate. "Life" is a placeholder for a conglomeration of conceptions. Like "information."There's lots of real features of the universe that disappear when we grind everything down.
How about life? Is life real? Well you certainly wont find it when you grind everthing to atomic powder, as that character proposed.
Is information a "medium"..? The "boundary" between two worlds? And that's why it's so hard to pinpoint what exactly it is..?
"Information" is a way of characterizing patterns of objects, rather like "number" is a way of characterizing multiplicity. It's basically a mathematical model.Maybe not... Interesting point.
Which returns me to my original question... What is information, really..?
Those processes go away when you grind everything down.Life is a concept. It represents real physical and chemical processes.
You can grind the universe down and find Hydrogen, Helium, etc. You can grind DNA and get adenine (A), cytosine (C), guanine (G), and thymine (T). You CANNOT grind down anything and get information. It is in the mind. It is your inference about how the world works.
It isn't reductionist at all. The OP topic is "Is Information Physically Real?" If by physical, you mean the physical processes that make/store our memories then, yes, it is physical. If by physical, you mean that information exists independently of the mind, then my answer is no.
I don't know how the brain works. I do know that if you damage the brain, you likely damage it's capabilities. You aren't seriously positing that memory doesn't reside in the brain, are you?Is information stored in neurons of the brain? Such as memories? Or is that a hypothetical model?
There are creationist arguments to the effect that "information" has ontological status as a substance.Not even sure what the OP is trying to get at by asking the question.
When you are talking about "words" you are not just talking about information, you are talking about information with a meaningful message encoded into it.God creates a universe. So if you break down everything he created and give words to talk about such things well that's information. Is there a difference between gold and silver? Yes. Words describing their difference is information so what are we talking about here that even warrants discussion?
You aren't seriously positing that memory doesn't reside in the brain, are you?
CoolNo. I just come up with thoughts sometimes, usually related to some modern philosophical concept that I've read about, or some scientific studies.
...I don’t have an agenda, So you don't have to worry about defending science, or classifying my arguments as part of some group.
There are creationist arguments to the effect that "information" has ontological status as a substance.
Information is a way we characterise how the world is arranged and behaves; in particular, the interactions between things in the world.Is information stored in neurons of the brain? Such as memories? Or is that only a hypothetical model too?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?