Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Is Hillary Clinton In Violation Of The Espionage Act Regarding Her Private Servers And Devices In Handling "Top Secret" Information?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Truth7t7" data-source="post: 77289676" data-attributes="member: 321339"><p>Comey's words used as "Grossly Negligent" were a plain and clear recommendation for prosecution</p><p></p><p>Comey then changed his tune, and let Hillary of the hook with the soft words of "Extremely Careless"</p><p></p><p>Of course Comey's words carry weight in a decision to charge and prosecute, do you deny this fact?</p><p></p><h3>18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information</h3><p></p><p>(f) <strong><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing</span></strong>, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) <strong><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody </span></strong>or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) <strong><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody </span></strong>or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—</p><p><strong><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.</span></strong></p><h3></h3><h3>FBI.GOV NEWS</h3><h3>Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System</h3><p>From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. <strong><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; </span></strong><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)"><strong>36 chains contained Secret information at the time;</strong> </span>and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification.</p><p></p><p><strong><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. </span></strong>In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails).</p><p></p><p><strong><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail.</span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)"></span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.</span></strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Truth7t7, post: 77289676, member: 321339"] Comey's words used as "Grossly Negligent" were a plain and clear recommendation for prosecution Comey then changed his tune, and let Hillary of the hook with the soft words of "Extremely Careless" Of course Comey's words carry weight in a decision to charge and prosecute, do you deny this fact? [HEADING=2]18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information[/HEADING] (f) [B][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing[/COLOR][/B], code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) [B][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody [/COLOR][/B]or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) [B][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody [/COLOR][/B]or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer— [B][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.[/COLOR][/B] [HEADING=2][/HEADING] [HEADING=2]FBI.GOV NEWS[/HEADING] [HEADING=2]Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System[/HEADING] From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. [B][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; [/COLOR][/B][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)][B]36 chains contained Secret information at the time;[/B] [/COLOR]and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. [B][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. [/COLOR][/B]In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails). [B][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.[/COLOR][/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Is Hillary Clinton In Violation Of The Espionage Act Regarding Her Private Servers And Devices In Handling "Top Secret" Information?
Top
Bottom