Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
First of all, I apologize. I thought that I was responding in the "Evidene for Evolution" thread - where you were shown to be mistaken. It gets confusing when you post the same nonsense in every thread.
Now, I asked a simple question, cant you answer?
How is your denying reality shown to be a mistake on my part?
I'll ask again, show me the different infraspecific taxa in the species in the fossil record?
The only nonsense I see is people trying to deny their mistakes in classification.
No, they are not modern humans, but simply another infraspecific taxa in the human species.
All life on this planet follows those guidelines: Husky, Mastiff, Poodle for example. Red tailed deer, white tailed deer, mule deer for example. We could do this for every species in existence.
Now look at the fossil record and notice there exist no infraspecific taxa, because they have incorrectly listed them as seperate species. The fossil record is divorced from reality due to this incorrect classification of the different infraspecific taxa within a species as seperate species. This led them to an incorrect belief in gradual evolution of species to species, when it is simply a mistaken classification of the various infraspecific taxa.
Please read the following article:
Technically, Earth Does Not Orbit Around the Sun
I did not claim that geocentrism is true or that the Earth is stationary.Technically, the Earth is not stationary. Geocentrism falsified.
I did not claim that geocentrism is true or that the Earth is stationary.
Did scientists agree with them back then ... that the Bible claims a stationary Earth?Theologians in previous generations did claim that the Bible spoke of the Earth as being stationary, and that all of the heavenly bodies sped around the Earth.
Did scientists agree with them back then ... that the Bible claims a stationary Earth?
Just like they do today?
There are Theologians today who challenge the existence of Jesus and who tag much of the Bible as myth.Theologians in previous generations did claim that the Bible spoke of the Earth as being stationary, and that all of the heavenly bodies sped around the Earth. That's what I am talking about.
There are Theologians today who challenge the existence of Jesus and who tag much of the Bible as myth.
I met a pastor who was living in fornication and preaching righteousness.
The Popes peached love but approved of the Inquisition.
What theologians understood and preached isn't necessarily what the Bible meant.
Back then, theologians and scientists were the same.We are talking about the theologians, not the scientists.
That depends on the individual creationist and what his specific claim might be.And now we have theologians (i.e. creationists) who claim that all of science has to be wrong because their findings conflict with the Bible. How are those theologians (i.e. creationists) any better than the theologians you speak of?
That depends on the individual creationist and what his specific claim might be.
No argument there.They wouldn't be creationists if they accepted science.
A long one on a short pier.Theologians can take a hike?
Sort of like the brain size between say a pug and a Mastiff?
So that really doesn't show evolution at all, just the variation in size and appearance that occurs within the different infraspecific taxa in the species itself. It proves no gradual evolutionary changes from species to species any more than a pug or Mastiff prove evolution to different species.
These guys were posed, weren't they?
These guys were posed, weren't they?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?