Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Is Creationism actually science?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Transcendentian" data-source="post: 75861799" data-attributes="member: 419983"><p>If Creationism is not science then Evolution-ism is not science. If Evolution-ism is science then Creationism is also science. They're both doing the same thing from opposite perspectives, which is: starting with a given assumption about reality and then trying to use science to prove that assumption. </p><p></p><p>Both Creationists and Evolutionists firmly believe that their theories are unshakeable and 100% proven and the absolute truth. Both have some scientific evidence to back their claims up, both also have lack of scientific evidence, which they both ignore.</p><p></p><p>In order to properly do science, one has to make assumptions to start with. There is no such thing as an objective scientist. There are no scientists who can be trusted to handle scientific facts objectively, everyone thinks they're so high and mighty, that they're right and everyone else is wrong. There is such a thing as absolute Truth, but I don't think it can be obtained by the scientific method.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Transcendentian, post: 75861799, member: 419983"] If Creationism is not science then Evolution-ism is not science. If Evolution-ism is science then Creationism is also science. They're both doing the same thing from opposite perspectives, which is: starting with a given assumption about reality and then trying to use science to prove that assumption. Both Creationists and Evolutionists firmly believe that their theories are unshakeable and 100% proven and the absolute truth. Both have some scientific evidence to back their claims up, both also have lack of scientific evidence, which they both ignore. In order to properly do science, one has to make assumptions to start with. There is no such thing as an objective scientist. There are no scientists who can be trusted to handle scientific facts objectively, everyone thinks they're so high and mighty, that they're right and everyone else is wrong. There is such a thing as absolute Truth, but I don't think it can be obtained by the scientific method. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Is Creationism actually science?
Top
Bottom