Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If there is a creator and even if it becomes universally accepted, there still would not be any scientific evidence unless the creator provided it.Of course. And as it becomes increasingly evident that a Creator was involved, one would hope that this would eventually be universally accepted.
But there's no specification on what type of creationism the OP is referring to. So even theistic Evolution would be included.That may be, and we can hope and pray that it will come to pass. But a literal interpretation of Genesis will remain the eccentric belief of a few minority Protestant sects.
It is not, its quite original in its monotheism and other things. It was obviously written inside Jewish religious cultural context.Knowing how religions are build on the beliefs of previous religions, I suspect the Biblical account of Creation is pre-Jewish in nature.
Because, for whatever reasons, God made the supernatural inaccessible to scientific inquiry.That's nonsense. Why can't you use scientific means to show the existance of the one who created scientific laws?
Depends on how you define the supernatural. The science today got so deeply into the fabric of creation that they can see and experimentally test the nature in a state that is not determined by any macro-world natural rules.Because, for whatever reasons, God made the supernatural inaccessible to scientific inquiry.
Out of the dead rock dirt is made and of which the vibrancy of life is evolving.Oh ... only the dead rock and reel in pain?
True, but only YECs take issue with science the way you do. (And as a matter of custom, "creationism" as used in this forum generally refers to YECism.But there's no specification on what type of creationism the OP is referring to.
If that were possible it would have happened by now.That's nonsense. Why can't you use scientific means to show the existance of the one who created scientific laws?
I think that would supernatural by inference, much like Behe's "irreducible complexity" for design.Depends on how you define the supernatural. The science today got so deeply into the fabric of creation that they can see and experimentally test the nature in a state that is not determined by any macro-world natural rules.
There are quite a few scientific hypothesis about this "supernatural world" that creates our natural world we see and live in.
Out of the dead rock dirt is made and of which the vibrancy of life is evolving.
What if...the Bible requires us to believe in the supernatural? So, what if, God came to earth with his superhumans who then went off to mate with early woman, kick starting mankind as we are, and brought with them angels who brought a higher intelligence than we had at that time, although I do have a hard time believing the entire earth was formed in 7 days in the entirety as we know it.Edgar a creationist wrote at Peaceful Science
"Creationism is actually science. By now, empirical science has made it perfectly obvious that viable life is so functionally complex that it could not possibly have happened by chance.
In effect, Abiogenesis-by-Chance has officially been declared a superstition - not to mention, an insult to human intelligence.
Faced with the scientific impossibility of chance, the only rational - and therefore, scientific - explanation for the origin of life is design, or more specifically, divine creation. Voila! … Creation is science. Get used to it."
It has to do with the ecology of the Earth. Before life evolved this planet was a rock. The rock broke down into dirt. It is from the dirt that the biosphere we live in evolved. It's all one big system.What?
That's rather an obscure subset; we don't see them very often here. Most theistic evolutionists do, I believe.Old Earth creationists don't necessarily support the standard evolution model.
It may possibly expand what we consider life.Not necessarily. New discoverys in quantum physics could change everything.
So? Wasn't there a movie that supports both old Earth and young simultaneously? From the perspective of someone in deep space ( God) the earth would be old but from the perspective if someone on it it's young. Time is relative.That's rather an obscure subset; we don't see them very often here. Most theistic evolutionists do, I believe.
You can ..renniks said:Why can't you use scientific means to show the existance of the one who created scientific laws?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?